Analysis of ‘Trout Mask Replica’

I: Introduction

Trout Mask Replica is the third album by Captain Beefheart and His Magic Band, released in 1969 as a double album. The music was written by Beefheart (Don Van Vliet), composed at a piano, and arranged by the drummer of the band, John French (nicknamed “Drumbo,” and uncredited on the album).

TMR was produced by Frank Zappa, offering Beefheart complete artistic freedom on Zappa’s new label, Straight Records. This was Zappa’s most memorable album production (The Rolling Stone Encyclopedia of Rock and Roll, page 1105), as TMR has some of the most radically experimental music of anything in the history of rock and roll. The album combines Delta blues, free jazz, and 20th century avant-garde classical music concepts to create a near-chaotic sound with polymetre, polyrhythms, and polytonality.

I must be frank about TMR. It is by no means easy listening. It’s an acquired taste, to put it mildly. I remember my first listening to it as a teen in the mid-1980s, and I was so frustrated with it at the time that I almost wanted to rip the first record off the turntable and throw it against the wall. In the back of my mind, though, I sensed that significant forces were at work on this album, mysterious forces, but ones worth sticking with. Over time, I came to understand what I was hearing little by little, and now I realize that TMR rewards repeated hearings.

Indeed, this album, though initially selling poorly (as might be expected from such a challenging recording), is now considered Beefheart’s masterpiece, and is a great influence on many other artists, including those outside of music, like Matt Groening and David Lynch. Musicians who have praised TMR include John Lydon, John Frusciante, and Steve Vai. The album is ranked #60 on Rolling Stone‘s 500 Greatest Albums of All Time list.

Here is a link to the complete album, and here is a link to all of the song lyrics.

Though Beefheart was a great blues player of the harmonica, he doesn’t play it at all on TMR. Instead, apart from his usual, gravelly blues-inflected singing (with a range of about four and a half octaves, from a deep vocal fry you can especially hear on “Dachau Blues” to a high falsetto), he also plays such winds as tenor and soprano saxophones, bass clarinet, and musette…all with a wild, atonal, free-jazz honking spontaneity that couldn’t care less what notes he was hitting.

Other musicians on the album, apart from the aforementioned French, include guitarist Jeff Cotton (nicknamed “Antennae Jimmy Semens”), guitarist Bill Harkleroad (nicknamed “Zoot Horn Rollo”), bassist Mark Boston (nicknamed “Rockette Morton”), and bass clarinetist Victor Hayden (“The Mascara Snake”). Doug Moon plays guitar on “China Pig,” and a number of the Mothers of Invention play on “The Blimp” (though uncredited and mostly inaudible).

Side One

II: Frownland

The themes that pervade this entire double album are paradox, contradiction, and incongruity: these are felt in the surreal lyrics as well as in the dissonant, polymetric music, made clear already in this song. A thorough analysis of the song, by Samuel Andreyev, can be found here; what he has to say about the musical structure of this 1:40-long song can give you a sense of how just about all the songs (apart from three a cappella ones) on TMR were put together.

Examples of paradox, contradiction, and incongruity in “Frownland” include the seeming chaos of it. In my introduction above, I mentioned the “near-chaotic sound” of all the music on TMR: that was a tad misleading, for in fact, all of the songs were tightly, precisely constructed. Beefheart’s music has been described as “a sort of modern chamber music for rock band, since he plan[ned] every note and [taught] the band their parts by ear.” (The Rolling Stone Encyclopedia of Rock and Roll, page 147) Actually, French transcribed many musical fragments that resulted from Beefheart’s noodling around on the piano, an instrument on which he had neither musical training nor experience playing. If Beefheart didn’t get a musical idea from the piano, he whistled it for the band.

Elsewhere, there’s paradox and contradiction in the music’s dissonance and seeming atonality. Actually, “Frownland” opens in C major, then it soon switches to the relative minor of A, followed by other modulations, as Andreyev explains in his video (link above). What is true about the dissonance is the frequent use of polytonality. Furthermore, not only is there polymetre, there’s also a juxtaposition of different tempi in this song, coordinated and synchronized so that the conflicting riffs begin and end together. Such an amazing accomplishment, heard elsewhere on the album many times, justifies the Rolling Stone Record Guide‘s comment that TMR‘s music is “astonishingly advanced rhythmically,” with “superb guitar work.”

As for the song lyric, consider a comparison of how the singer yearns for a happy world–in which “a man can stand by another man without an ego flyin’, with no man lyin’, an no one dyin’ by an earthly hand”–with how Beefheart actually treated his band during the creation and rehearsals of TMR. To say he was a domineering, hard task master is to put it mildly.

The band rehearsed his difficult compositions for eight grueling months, living communally in a small house in Woodland Hills, LA. They had minimal food to eat, often having–in their poverty–to shoplift, then need to get bailed out by Zappa when arrested. Worse, Beefheart was emotionally, verbally, and even physically abusive to his band, not allowing them to leave the house and making them practice for fourteen or more hours a day. French described the experience as “cult-like,” and another observed that it was “positively Manson-esque.” The house was Beefheart’s Frownland: his singing that he could “not go back to your Frownland” was pure projection.

So, as with Stanley Kubrick in his uncompromising vision to make a great film out of The Shining–resulting in the abuse of poor Shelley Duvall and the driving of Scatman Crothers to tears after endless reshoots of scenes–Beefheart demonstrated in TMR that he was both an artistic genius and an asshole.

III: The Dust Blows Forward ‘n’ the Dust Blows Back

This is the first of three tracks on the album with Beefheart singing alone, with no backup band at all. The other two songs of this sort are “Well” and “Orange Claw Hammer.”

The song’s imagery is of an ugly natural landscape, with a feeling of Depression-era poverty. In other words, the Frownland continues, though Beefheart again tries to keep his spirits up when he’s “[taken] off [his] pants and felt free, the breeze blowin’ up [him].”

“Tote an old grain in a printed sack” suggests the poor of the Depression having to lug their belongings as they move somewhere in hopes of finding work, as the Joad family does in Steinbeck‘s Grapes of Wrath. “The smokestack blows up in the sun’s eye,” for “the wind blows black through the sky,” a depiction of the ugly reality of urban industrialization. Yet Beefheart sings all of this with a paradoxically cheerful melody.

Indeed, in this song, Beefheart has temporarily tossed aside his usual blues leanings to sing what sounds like a traditional, old-fashioned song, like something a white working-class man might have sung in the 1930s. Instead of his non-rhotic, blues-inflected, gravelly voice, he sings with the rhotic, rustic charm of a ‘country bumpkin.’

Though the singer is in a depressing setting, where “the dust blows forward ‘n’ the dust blows back,” reminding one of the Dust Bowl era of Steinbeck’s novel, the singer tries to sound cheerful, “hand full o’ worms and a pole fishin’…gone fishin’ for a week.” This juxtaposition of depressing imagery with a cheerful singing tone is one of many examples on TMR of the themes of paradox, contradiction, and incongruity.

Examples of pollution, apart from “the wind blows black” and “the smokestack blows up,” include “a lipstick Kleenex hung on a pointed forked twig,” “one red bean stuck in the bottom of a tin bowl,” and “hot coffee from a crimped-up can.” With these sad images are also pleasant, if surreal, ones like “the moon looks like a dandelion.” These contradictions indicate that, while Beefheart is still in Frownland, his smile is stuck.

IV: Dachau Blues

As the title of this song implies, it’s about the Holocaust, in particular, the Dachau Nazi concentration camp. Beyond those atrocities, though, the song is also an antiwar one in general, begging our politicians to heed the warnings and protests of the young activists of the late 1960s, not to allow the Cold War between the capitalist West and the Soviet East to escalate to WWIII and nuclear annihilation.

While musically, the song has plenty of fitting harmonic tension, including some wild honking on the bass clarinet and tenor sax, Beefheart’s singing in vocal fry–an impressive demonstration of his vocal range–gives off an almost comic effect, which seems inappropriate for the song’s serious subject. Perhaps that ‘comic’ effect is meant to underscore the absurdity of continuing with warmongering and hate in our dangerously nuclear age.

The song ends with a monologue by Boston, the bassist, in which he talks about people trying to get rid of a bunch of rats by shooting at them with shotguns and beating them with sticks. One could hear a parallel in this monologue with the subject of “Dachau Blues”: the rats represent the Jews, or any group persecuted by fascists; the fascists, shooting in all directions, making one think one is going to get killed, are endangering the survival of everyone on the Earth with their reckless hate and violence.

V: Ella Guru

After all of the negativity felt and avoided (or what one at least tried to avoid) in the previous three tracks, in this one, Beefheart has only positive things to say in his praise of a girl he calls “Ella Guru.” She is lovely and wise, since “she knows all the colours that nature do.” Though the stress is on the second syllable of her ‘surname,’ she seems to be a true guru in life, for, “lookin’ like a zoo,” she is wonderfully wild and free as an animal. Though “like a zoo,” she is paradoxically not locked up in any cage.

She is as beautiful as the “moon,” which recall, “looks like a dandelion” in the second track. Her three primary colours, with puns on “yella”/”Ella” and “blue”/”blew,” make her beautiful. Beefheart has lecherous thoughts about her beauty, too, since “she blew,” “she’s young, too,” and is “tight, also.”

The point is that she’s beautiful in body and soul, and Beefheart wants to praise her as one of the few good things left in this stinking world. She helps him to keep his smile stuck, so he won’t have to go back to Frownland. She’s no phony: “She do what she mean and she do what she do.”

In the middle, instrumental section of the song, where the guitars are playing in a progression of F major and E♭major, the drums are going back and forth between a shuffle rhythm based on triplets and a slightly faster, duplet rhythm based on the duration between the first and third of those triplets (that’s at least what I think it is). In any case, it’s yet another example of how “astonishingly advanced rhythmically” the entire album is.

VI: Hair Pie: Bake 1

I’ll discuss the musical structure of this track when I get to “Bake 2.” As for “Bake 1,” I’ll discuss only what makes it different from 2, which isn’t very much in terms of musical structure.

The title of these instrumentals sounds like a lecherous continuation of Beefheart’s infatuation with Ella Guru. Since “she blew” in that song, it seems here that Beefheart is returning the favour with his honking on the soprano sax and bass clarinet (that low note on the latter being played by “The Mascara Snake,” I assume), this being the one essential difference between Bakes 1 and 2. Apart from that difference, Bake 1 also slowly fades in, with less and less sax and bass clarinet towards the end, while “Bake 2” is heard at full volume throughout, with no wind instruments at all.

Another difference between Bakes 1 and 2 is that the latter was recorded in a studio, whereas the former was recorded in the house the band was living in, the sax and bass clarinet parts in the garden of the house…hence Beefheart’s comment to the two visitors heard after the end of the instrumental: he tells them, “It’s a bush recording. We’re out recording the bush.” This “bush” reference sounds also like more of Beefheart’s lecherous feelings for Ella Guru, his blowing on the sax is an eating of her hair pie.

VII: Moonlight on Vermont

Beefheart spuriously claimed that he wrote all of the songs on TMR in one eight-hour session. “Moonlight on Vermont,” as well as “Sugar ‘n’ Spikes,” were actually written around December of 1967, and “Veteran’s Day Poppy” was written in mid-1968. The rest of the music was mostly written over the summer and fall of 1968. This would explain why these former three songs aren’t as radically experimental as the music of the rest of the album, but are more bluesy.

Other interesting features of “Moonlight on Vermont” that are worthy of mention include the, I’d say, ironic reference to the spiritual “Old Time Religion,” and to Steve Reich‘s “Come Out.” These two elements, appearing towards the end of the song, are as I say ironic because if anything, Beefheart’s song is about getting away from tradition and the leaden repetition that comes from it (and Reich’s recording). So the yearning for tradition (“that old time religion”) and the breaking away from it (to get away from Frownland) is more paradox and contradiction.

The song’s lyric is based on the old belief that the moon can make us into lunatics. Some man in the song has gone so wild, he’s brandishing a pistol (or is it his phallus? Has he seen Ella Guru?). The upper-class people of the lunatic neighbourhood aren’t playing bridge anymore.

“No more bridge” for “high society” could represent the bringing-down of the ruling class, liberating the rest of us as a result of the lunatic influence of the moon (“Goes to show you what a moon can do.”). The freeing of us in turn means we can finally get rid of the “white elephant” of our oppression, so we can be free to express ourselves, “escaped from the zoo with love.” We’ll be “walkin’, lookin’ like a zoo,” as Ella Guru does. We’ll be “free to grow as flowers,” as Beefheart sings in “Sweet Sweet Bulbs.”

Side Two

VIII: Pachuco Cadaver

Before the song begins, we get one of a number of Beefheart’s references to a preoccupation of his, his expression “fast and bulbous.” We already heard it in “Ella Guru.” It can be related to the upcoming song, “Sweet Sweet Bulbs,” too. He’s talking about something flowering, growing…yet plants aren’t fast in their growing.

In “fast and bulbous,” therefore, we hear another paradox, or contradiction. It seems rather like the development of TMR: Beefheart’s dictatorial driving of his band to practice his difficult music for long hours every day, never allowing them to leave the house, and berating them abusively whenever they made mistakes–this was the “fast” in the music’s “bulbous” growth.

Furthermore, the “fast and bulbous” paradox is a reflection of the contradiction between, on the one hand, the Frownland that Beefheart wants to stay away from, which is stressful in how “fast” everything has to be (think of how much worse we have it today, with all of our multitasking), and on the other hand, the childlike, free world that Beefheart yearns for, the “bulbous” world where we’re “free to grow as flowers,” where we’re “walkin’, lookin’ like a zoo” with Ella Guru.

Accordingly, we hear a number of references to flowers on TMR: “the moon looks like a dandelion,” the flowers in “Sweet Sweet Bulbs,” “Veteran’s Day Poppy,” and “her skin is as smooth as the daisies,” in “Pachuco Cadaver.”

The song begins with a guitar riff in A major, while the bass plays Es in groups of three, one set an octave apart from the other, and they’re played at a tempo slower than that of the guitars and drums. Beefheart then comes in, doing spoken word.

Whoever “she” is (Is it Ella Guru again?), she wears a “bolero,” which on the one hand is a cropped jacket, and on the other–given Beefheart’s predilection for lyrics full of puns and surrealist imagery–a Spanish dance in 3/4 time from the late 18th century…hence, “when she wears her bolero, then she begin to dance.” Her car, a Chevy sedan, is a “Pachuco Cadaver,” referring to how a Mexican-American might own an old car made from scraps, with a steering wheel from “a B-29 Bomber.” The car is “forever amber,” because of how rusted up it is–yellow with rust.

The “yellow jackets ‘n’ red debbles” (devils), which are “buzzin’ ’round her hair hive ho,” are barbiturates (pentobarbital and secobarbital/Seconal respectively for the yellows and reds), often taken in the 1960s by women with beehive hairstyles (one is reminded of that old song by the Rolling Stones). So “she” has her hair like this, and she’s buzzing on “chill pills” as she drives her car.

We get more puns when we hear that “she wears her past like a present.” The present can be a gift (the bolero jacket), or it can mean that she is a person of all times, past or present. ‘She looks like an old squaw Indian,” yet if she’s Ella, “she’s young, too.” Old, yet young. Another paradox…past, yet present.

“She” certainly seems to possess the attractive qualities of Ella Guru, for “her lovin’ makes [Beefheart] so happy,” he’d crack his chin if he smiled. “Her eyes are so peaceful, thinks it’s heaven she be in.” As these lines are said by Beefheart, the music has become cheerful, even celebratory, with a shuffle rhythm and guitar riffs in A major, at one point shifting down to A♭major, then back to A♮major; and the drummer sometimes shifts from the shuffle (often with quick triplets hit on the ride cymbal) to duplets played on the hi-hat. (Somewhere in this song, the melody from “Shortnin’ Bread” is heard among the guitars, but it seems to be so buried in there that I cannot pinpoint it.)

I mentioned above how “her skin is as smooth as the daisies” in reference to Beefheart’s love of flowers; it should be added to this the significance of “in the center where the sun shines in,” or, of course, the yellow centre of a daisy. This comparison of a flower to a light in the sky should be linked to another such comparison I also mentioned earlier: “the moon looks like a dandelion,” from the second track. These lines in turn should be related to what Beefheart sings in “Frownland”: “My spirit’s made up of the ocean and the sky and the sun and the moon…” He loves the flowers, the sun, and the moon; these beauties of nature are all one to him.

Fittingly, “when she walks, flowers surround her, let their nectar come into the air around her.” If she’s Ella, “she comes walkin’, lookin’ like a zoo”: natural, wild, free, and beautiful–like flowers. Is Ella the earth mother-goddess? “Her lovin’ stick out like stars.” The sun is a star, the centre of a daisy, like her skin. Her love is a star, the sun, the centre of a flower.

Beefheart would like to emulate her spontaneity with a sax solo that, though going along with the rhythm of the band, couldn’t care less if it conforms with the harmony or not. After that, the back-up band continues playing the cheerful riff in A major for a while, and the song ends.

IX: Bill’s Corpse

“Bill” in the song’s title refers to guitarist Zoot Horn Rollo (Bill Harkleroad), who upon having left an LSD cult to join Beefheart’s Magic Band had been in an emaciated condition; in fact, that emaciation may have also been a result of the conditions Beefheart had created in the house while the band rehearsed (recall how the band had starved).

Bill’s corpse can thus be seen as a metaphor for the unhappy, degraded state of the world described in this song lyric. After the celebratory happiness we heard in “Pachuco Cadaver” (an ironic song title to have come just before this track, the two songs giving off opposing moods…yet such is the thematic nature of TMR–paradox, contradiction, and incongruity), we have come back to Frownland.

“Quietly, the rain played down on the last of ashes,” Beefheart sings as the band plays in D minor to a by-now-typically conflicting rhythm. “She…” (Ella Guru, the sad earth mother-goddess?) is “hideously looking back at what once was beautiful.”

Since “her ragged hair was shining, red, white, and blue,” we can see how Ella Guru has gone from her happy yellow, red, and blue primary colours to those of the flag of the United States, where oppression and unhappiness have reigned for so long. Such misery is apparent in how, for example, “the goldfish in the bowl lay upside-down bloatin’,” symbolic of how environmental damage has harmed marine life in the rivers, lakes, and oceans…great fish bowls, as it were (also, there was the Dust Bowl of the Depression years).

Elsewhere, “the plains were bleached with white skeletons,” those of Native Americans killed by the white man and ironically, if redundantly, called “white skeletons,” or skeletons made so by whites. Related to the Native American genocide is how “various species [were] grouped together according to their past beliefs,” which can represent racism, which has sometimes been rationalized with Biblical quotes like Genesis 1:25. If God meant all the animals to be created “according to their kinds,” then, apparently, He would have wanted the black, white, Asian, and Native American ‘races’ to live “according to their kinds,” that is, separately.

Connected with such a racist attitude is how “the only way they ever got together was not in love, but shameful grief.” That is, the white supremacists got together for the purpose of persecuting blacks, Jews, natives, and any other racial or ethnic groups they hated. So much of the history of the “red, white, and blue” has been made up of such hatred. Beefheart doesn’t want us “to get together” in such ways. Getting together is normally associated with love, not hate; so this hateful getting together is yet another example in TMR of paradoxes and contradictions.

So “the rain [of sadness] played down,” that is, rained down on our world and ruined our happiness, saddening earth-goddess Ella Guru, the lady who would “look out of love.” She “should have us all,” that is, together and happy, or, if we cannot be, then she “should have us fall.”

X: Sweet Sweet Bulbs

In this song, we’ve left Frownland again, and we’re back with happy Ella Guru, that is, “in [Beefheart’s] lady’s garden,” where the “sweet, sweet, sweet, sweet bulbs grow,” and where “warm, warm, warm, warm, warm sun-fingers wave.” This garden could also be that of the house where he and his Magic Band were practicing his music…though–yet another contradiction!– he was actually working them like slaves, as I pointed out above.

For him, at least, the garden is a happy place where “flowers dance” and the sun, whose “fingers wave,” is also associated with joy, as I mentioned earlier. “Hominy,” a Mesoamerican food item, was eaten by the poor during the Great Depression, and thus it links this song with track 2 off of Side One.

She herself is linked to hominy, in her “smile” and her “snatch,” which in turn links her to Bakes 1 and 2 of “Hair Pie,” since–among other, obvious reasons–hominy is frequently used as a base for baked dishes, and there are pies with hominy, including baked Tex-Mex/Southwest pies.

Since, as I said above, hominy was eaten by the poor during the Depression, we can link it with the bare subsistence diet that the band had to eat while working on Beefheart’s music, in that house with that garden nearby: French, for example, had no more than a small cup of soybeans a day for a month. So the contradiction here is between the joy Beefheart is feeling about his artistic inspiration and his music being played on the one hand, and the suffering his band is going through on the other.

He calls Ella “Phoebe,” this name being a female version of Phoebus, as in Apollo, a god associated with the sun, since Ella, flowers, and the sun are images of happiness for Beefheart. Recall how “her skin is as smooth as the daisies, in the center where the sun shines in,” for “her lovin’ makes [Beefheart] so happy,” as he tells us in “Pachuco Cadaver.” He sees “Phoebe” in her bonnet, “with the sunset written on it.”

As for the music, we primarily hear a merry set of tunes played on the bass and guitars, in a largely pentatonic E major. By the middle of the second verse, though, the music gets more tense and in its by-now-typically disoriented state as Beefheart sings of how “just behind ya was the sea of negativity…she walked back into nature a queen uncrowned.” Yet when she recognizes herself “to be an heir to the throne,” and “her garden gate swings lightly without weight,” we return to the merry guitar and bass tunes in pentatonic E major.

Ella is the queen of this happy garden (of Eden?), which is “open to most anyone that needs a little freedom.” Beefheart would invite as many of us as can come to be “free to grow as flowers” and “share her throne,” for in his utopia, we’re all equals…unless you’re a member of his Magic Band, of course.

XI: Neon Meate Dream of a Octafish

Since the surrealist lyric of this song is about a wet dream, or at least a sexual fantasy, I can now understand why–in his discussion with the two visitors about “Hair Pie: Bake 1” when the music is over–Beefheart confuses the title of that instrumental with that of this song. The former track is about the female genitalia, and this song is about the male genitalia.

Apart from the phallic tentacles of the “octafish,” and other sexually suggestive references to “incest,” “tubes,” “speckled,” “waddlin’ feast,” “buds burst,” “meate rose and hairs,” “meaty dream wet meat,” “twat trot,” “whale bone fields,” and “serum in semen,” the lyric is chock-full of Beefheart’s typical use of puns.

So this song can be seen as yet another example of Beefheart’s lusting after Ella Guru. Fittingly, the music has such dissonance in it that it can legitimately be called “musical masturbation.”

XII: China Pig

The White Stripes did a cover of this song.

In this improvised recording with Beefheart’s singing accompanied only by Doug Moon on guitar, we have TMR‘s closest approximation to pure Delta blues. It almost sounds like something Robert Johnson would have done.

The song is about a piggy bank (“china,” as in porcelain). Not wanting to kill Beefheart’s “china pig,” then, simply means he doesn’t want to break and destroy his piggy bank.

So, not wanting to destroy the piggy bank, in turn, represents a need to refrain from spending one’s money carelessly, a need to save money, because one is poor, as during the Great Depression, or as in the impoverished state the Magic Band was in, rehearsing in that house. “A man’s gotta live. A man’s gotta eat. A man’s gotta have shoes to walk out on the street.”

The piggy bank, of course, has “got a slot in his back.” If he is desperate to get his hands on some money, he whips out his fork and pokes at the piggy bank: “I put a fork in his back!” This is to get coins out without breaking it.

So a song about being poor and needing to count one’s pennies is aptly played in a Delta blues style, since so many of the old bluesmen sang about their sorrows. Things might be a lot happier if “flowers grow/[Beefheart’s] china pig be quite a show.”

XIII: My Human Gets Me Blues

This song begins with striking dissonances from the guitars, especially in contrast to the straightforward blues of the guitar in “China Pig.” Such dissonance is fitting, since the song is about the discord between what one is supposed to believe about Christianity and what we often do believe about it.

Beefheart begins his singing by addressing the baby Jesus in His “X-ray gingham dress.” Beefheart can see through it, because he can see through the phoniness of the religion. Gingham is a fabric with patterns of horizontal and vertical stripes that cross over each other; so like the X in “X-ray,” they represent the Cross that Christ was nailed on.

Jesus is in a “dress,” meaning those robes worn in ancient times; but “dress” is also used as a pun on “duress” in the second line of the first verse. Jesus was “under duress,” that is, forced by God to die on the Cross (Matthew 26:39). But Beefheart knew Jesus under his dress, that is, he could see, like an X-ray, under the phoniness of the religion that speaks in Jesus’ name.

Jesus can “keep comin’,” as in the Second Coming. Like all those clergymen in their robes (‘dresses,’ if you will) who represent Jesus, He’s “the best dressed,” that is, in all that Catholic finery (or, in the case of the evangelical Protestants wearing those fine, expensive suits), the religious authorities are showing off their wealth, they who represent Christ. They “look dandy in the sky,” like foppish dandies in those fancy clothes and fraudulently imitating Christ, but they’re no ‘dandelions’ to represent the flowers of true happiness, as Beefheart saw in the dandelion-looking moon.

Jesus is supposed to be our Saviour, to give us peace and comfort, yet He would scare us with threats of Hell for not believing in Him…still, He doesn’t scare Beefheart, who–seeing through the Church’s phoniness–has “got [Him] here in [his] eye.”

“In this lifetime,” that is, in the material world we’re in now, as opposed to the spiritual afterlife, “my human gets me blues” is the painful feeling of being regarded as a lowly sinner (“human”), fallen from the grace of God, and needing the authority of the Church to be restored to God’s grace, that is, needing to conform to Church doctrine to be saved…salvation by grace through faith (Ephesians 2:8).

Beefheart doesn’t want to be thus coerced into such conformity, to be “under duress.” He’d rather roam about freely in the flowery fields with Ella Guru. He knows Jesus would “never come back,” i.e., there will be no Second Coming, as the Church has so fraudulently promised for two millennia. In Matthew, chapter 24, it was prophesied that He would come back, with the end of the world, before the death of that very generation hearing Him (Matthew 24:34).

There’s an “old lady” who is “afraid [she’d] be the devil’s red wife,” which sounds like the Whore of Babylon, a place that in turn has been seen to represent Rome. Since this song is critical of Christianity, Babylon-as-Rome can be seen as the corrupt Roman Catholic Church.

“God dug [her] dance” just as Jesus dances in a way Beefheart knew He’d never come back, hence the link between her and Jesus, or the Whore of Babylon and the Roman Catholic Church. God would “have [her] young and in His harem”: she’s an “old lady” because being a whore is the oldest profession.

Now, “everybody made Him a boy,” that is, we have never traditionally regarded God as female, hence, the all-male priesthood to represent Him (1 Corinthians 14:35). Because of all of these faults in the Church, among so many others, Beefheart’s got the “human gets me blues,” that is, the sadness of having to deal with all those human, all-too-human faults of the Church, as opposed to its supposed divine authority over man.

XIV: Dali’s Car

This short instrumental for two electric guitars (played by Zoot Horn Rollo and Antennae Jimmy Semens) was the first that Beefheart composed for TMR. He called it a “study in dissonance,” according to French in his book, Beefheart: Through the Eyes of Magic, pages 805-806. The instrumental was inspired by Salvador Dali‘s Rainy Taxi, or Mannequin Rotting in a Taxi-Cab, from 1938.

Side Three

XV: Hair Pie: Bake 2

As I said in my description of Bake 1, the only major differences between the two “Bakes” are the absence of sax and bass clarinet honking here and no slow fade-in here, as well as no visitors asking about the music. Instead, this “Bake” ends with Beefheart shaking jingle bells with the tape being sped up.

Now I’ll discuss some of the musical highlights of these two instrumentals. We can hear examples of polytonality in the two guitar parts and in the bass, as well as polymetre and synchronized polyrhythms. One noteworthy example of the latter is, shortly into the beginning, when we hear a riff in 5/4 time, then the drummer pounds a strong shuffle rhythm (implying triplets), which at first is heard alone, then the guitars and bass return with the 5/4 riff, perfectly synchronized with the shuffle rhythm.

Later, we’ll hear polytonality in the guitar parts, with one playing a descending line of C, A, A♭, and G, while the other is playing G♭[4x], and A, the former implying a key of C to the latter’s implied D major.

We’ll also hear the polymetre of such conflicting time signatures as 3/4 against 4/4, and 5/4 against 4/4. All of this conflict in dissonance, metre, rhythm, tempo, and key makes up the album’s musical equivalent to the lyrical themes of paradox, contradiction, and incongruity.

Between this instrumental and the next track, “Pena,” we hear a goofy dialogue between Beefheart and the Mascara Snake about all things “fast and bulbous.” They mess up a few times, first from Beefheart laughing, then from the Mascara Snake coming in too early with the line “Bulbous also tapered.” Zappa can be heard giving directions.

I mentioned above how I interpreted “fast” to mean our stressful lives, with everything so fast-paced; yet on the other hand, “bulbous” refers to a free, organic, natural world of flowers. So “fast and bulbous” is a paradox of our happy, yet unhappy lives. “A tin teardrop” is a surreal reference to how our modern-day, metallic world is taking us away from that natural world and thus making us weep. So, “bulbous also tapered,” along with “also, a tin teardrop,” refer to how our natural world of beautiful, bulbous flowers is being diminished and reduced of its thick bulbousness.

XVI: Pena

Antennae Jimmy Semens narrates this one in a hysterical voice, with Beefheart doing high-pitched, unintelligible screaming in the background. “Pena,” with “her head…like a barrel of red velvet balls,” sounds like the feminine of “Penis.” Her name can also be seen as a variation on “poena,” as in “subpoena,” and other words like “penalty,” “punishment.” What is necessarily ‘punitive’ in this surreal narrative, though, may not be all that obvious to see at first, given how it more obviously seems like another coded, symbolic sex fantasy, like “Neon Meate Dream” above.

That the “velvet balls” are red is symbolic of love, since, according to this video (about 9:30 into it), Beefheart says red represents love, as yellow does wisdom, blue does peace, and green does logic in songs like “Pena” and “Ella Guru.” So Pena’s head, “clinking like a barrel of red velvet balls,” suggests a ‘female’ penis and testes.

Now, with this album having come out in 1969 and therefore long before transgender issues became a big concern in mainstream thinking the way they are today, I doubt that Pena’s hermaphroditism is meant as an expression of transgenderism. I think the ‘female penis and testes’ of Pena are just more of Beefheart’s surrealism, with sex differences still perceived as just a binary, and thus the hermaphroditism is yet another example of TMR‘s theme of contradictions.

It’s significant in this connection that both aptly-named Beefheart and…aptly-nicknamed Semens…have high-pitched voices on this recording, making them sound rather androgynous. It’s also worth noting that in the promotional photos for TMR, Semens is seen wearing a dress. With the names Jeff Cotton and “Jimmy,” he doesn’t identify as a female. He’s just in a dress as part of the philosophy of the Magic Band as free and defying social conventions–it’s the same with all the band members’ goofy-sounding nicknames.

Back to the narration. “Treats filled her eyes,” that is, Pena’s, “turning them yellow…soft like butter, hard not to pour.” The treats, I suspect, are phallic, and the eyes are yonic and anal, the soft, butter-like yellow being ejaculation. “Sitting on a [phallic] turned-on waffle iron, smoke billowing out from between her legs” sounds unmistakably sexual, “making [the phallus] vomit beautifully.”

She’d “fall on [his] stomach” while he’d “view her from a thousand happened facets,” that is, he ogles her naked body from all angles. He may have hurt himself in his ecstasy, hence the “liquid red salt,” or blood from lovemaking (I suppose this was the penal aspect of Pena); “[he] later Band-Aided the area, sighed, ‘Oh, well, it was worth it’.”

Pena was pleased with the lay she got, but “sore from sitting, chose to stub her toe”…so it seems that she got punished for her pleasure, too. And in this pleasure-pain of both lovers, we see yet another of TMR‘s paradoxes. The “red pockets” of the “white pulps” would be more blood from the stubbed toe. Her being “tired of playing ‘Baby'” could mean that Pena, with the raised social consciousness of Second Wave feminism in the late 1960s, doesn’t want her lover to treat her as a mere sex object anymore; for being treated as such, despite the pleasure she got from the sex, she feels like she’s being punished for it.

The “blue felt box” completes the red, white, and blue with the “pulps” and “pockets”–the American flag, colours complained about in “Bill’s Corpse.” Note how the red, white, and blue colours all appear around Pena’s protesting of not wanting to play ‘Baby’ anymore. It’s in reactionary governments like that of the US where women and other oppressed groups feel so confined.

On the other hand, red, yellow, and blue are the colours of free-spirited, wise Ella Guru. “Out of a blue felt box let escape one yellow butterfly the same size.” Out of the blue of peace came the yellow of wisdom (recall the colour symbolism of the Beefheart video–link above). White is often considered the absence of colours, so without yellow in red, white, and blue, there’s an absence of wisdom. If white is, alternatively, the sum of all colours, as it’s also sometimes deemed, then the red of love, yellow of wisdom, and blue of peace are all lost in the mix, as was the case in the American involvement in the Vietnam War going on in 1969, when TMR was released.

The yellow butterfly’s “droppings were tiny green phosphorous worms.” Green, according to that Beefheart video, represents logic. So, from the wisdom of yellow we get the green of logic. Of course, yellow mixed with blue (from the “blue felt box”) is green, so wisdom mixed with peace is logic.

The song lyric ends with Pena blowing raspberries: “Mouths open to tongues that vibrated and lost saliva.” Is she, in her red love, yellow wisdom, blue peace, and green logic, sticking her tongue out at the freedom-crushing US flag? Is hermaphrodite Pena’s/penis’s defying of sex roles, in not wanting to play ‘Baby’ anymore, an example of that defiance?

In any case, the song musically ends with dissonant riffs heard mainly in 5/4, among some polyrhythms.

XVII: Well

This is the second of three tracks on TMR that Beefheart sings a cappella. As usual with his lyrics, this one is full of surrealist imagery.

A lot of the imagery is of oppositions: day/night, black/white, hard/soft, hard (as in ‘bad’)/well, melted/froze, and silent/scream. His singing is largely a hitting of two notes: G and E, implying a shift back and forth from G major to its relative minor in E. This implied progression suggests yet another opposition: major/minor. All of these musical and lyrical oppositions add to TMR‘s general theme of contradictions.

In the first two lines of the first verse, we hear of a human being (“a red raft of blood”) going through his day (“light floats down day river”) and feeling the sunlight. Then comes the night, with a giant black…beetle?…large enough to block out the light of heaven, the shining of “its hard, soft shell” is “white in one spot,” implying the shining of the moon and stars. Life is hard, but the singer is “doing well, well.”

“The white ice horse melted,” yet the singer “froze in solid motion.” In a reversal of time sequence, the horse’s mane melted last, and after that, the tail melted…more contradiction and incongruity. The melting of an ice horse sculpture would seem a bad thing, but it’s all “well” to the singer. His “life ran through [his] veins” in the “red raft of blood” that is his body. Is “the ocean swarmin’ body…well” Brahman, as opposed to the Atman of his “red raft” body?

Since the blackness of the night is “like a big, black, shiny bug,” then the singer’s having “heard the beetle clickin'” means he’s hearing the sounds of the night…then [he’d] “begin to dream” at night. And with the dreaming would come more surrealist imagery, since surrealism is an expression of the unconscious mind, and as Freud once said, “the interpretation of dreams is the royal road to a knowledge of the unconscious activities of the mind.” So in all of Beefheart’s surrealist, non-rational dreaming, his “mind cracked like custard,” etc.

The “thick, black felt birds…flying” sounds like a metamorphosis of the “big, black, shiny bug” of night, these birds flying everywhere and blocking out heaven’s light. Now, they have “capes” and “feathers of solid chrome,” which can be a shiny, decorative cover on cars and motorbikes. So the night is shiny again, indicating the light of the moon and stars, “and bleached the air around them, white and cold, well, well.”

This white in black, just like all the other oppositions discussed above, can also be interpreted in terms of the dialectical monism of the yin and yang of Taoism. Yin is black, and yang is white. So, though “it showed in pain,” all is “well, well.”

XVIII: When Big Joan Sets Up

“Big Joan” would appear to be the diametrical opposite of Ella Guru, who is wise and attractive to Beefheart, whereas Joan is “too fat to go out in the daylight,” and her hands and “arms are too small.”

The song begins with a frantic guitar riff in A: a bend from A to B, then the guitar goes up to E, back down to B, down to E an octave lower, E again, up to A, to D, and to the upper E again. This is heard mixed in with other high-pitched guitar leads that Beefheart follows with his high-pitched vocalizing.

Joan’s physical unattractiveness sounds more like a comment on society’s unfairly high beauty standards for women than an actual criticism of her looks. She once “compared her navel to the moon,” as if to see beauty in her body, though society refuses to see that beauty.

Beefheart is willing to accept her as she is: he’ll “set up with…Big Joan,” for he admits that he, too, is “too fat to go out in the daylight,” just as she is. He “won’t droop” if she promises not to complain about her small hands. She needs to accept herself as she is, too.

“Something’s happening,” that is, the world of the late 1960s was changing in terms of its social attitudes, so Big Joan is finally willing to come out publicly. In this sense, Beefheart’s song is like “Take Your Clothes Off When You Dance,” by Zappa and the Mothers of Invention, from the 1968 album, We’re Only In It for the Money, in which “there will come a time when you won’t even be ashamed if you are fat.”

Yet, on the other hand, immediately after Beefheart says she’s “come out,” he essentially says she cannot come out, for “she ain’t built for going naked, so she can’t wear any new clothes, or go to the beach.” So we have in this verse another example of TMR‘s many contradictions.

“They laugh at her body,” oddly, not because she’s big and fat, but “’cause her hands are too small.” Is she “outta reach” because her hands are too small to reach us, or too small for us to reach them? Or both? Is this the real problem, not her physical appearance, but our inability to connect with anybody, while we use physical imperfections as an excuse not to reach out to other people?

“Hoy! Hoy! Is she a boy?” is an allusion to “300 Pounds of Joy,” by Howlin’ Wolf (i.e., the line “Hoy! Hoy! I’m the boy!”) As with “Pena,” the line between masculine and feminine is being blurred in Beefheart’s song, and while in Howlin’ Wolf’s song, his obesity is being celebrated, so does Beefheart’s allusion to it imply a needed celebration of Big Joan as a BBW, not a mere ‘fatso.’

As with an implied celebration of her looks, so can we hear, in Beefheart’s soprano sax soloing and in the band’s sudden, jerky stops and awkward silences, celebrations of dissonances and weirdness in general, things not normally valued, yet which perhaps should be.

XIX: Fallin’ Ditch

Speaking of being unattractive to those of the opposite sex, according to the dialogue between Beefheart and bassist Rockette Morton, which precedes the next song, it seems that one needn’t worry about the latter “with any of those girls” because, “tak[ing] off again into the wind” (like a rocket, no doubt), he “run[s] on beans,” making him not smell exactly of cologne.

The lyric of this song seems to be a repeat of the emotional conflict expressed in “Frownland”: pain is unavoidable, but one tries to avoid it all the same, of course. Beefheart won’t let any setbacks in his life break his spirit.

Accordingly, the music starts off with the usual dissonance and conflicting instrumental parts, yet by the second verse, after we hear the refrain, “Fallin’ ditch ain’t gonna get my bones,” the musical back-up is more tonally centred and up-beat, suggesting a more positive outlook on life.

We all “trip” every now and then, and “get lonesome,” and when we’re down like this, in the “fallin’ ditch, somebody wanna throw the dirt right down,” that is, there’s always somebody who wats to make us feel even worse. When Beefheart “feel[s] like dying, the sun come out,” that is, he knows that when matters are at their worst, that is when our fortune often changes for the better.

So he, defiant against all ill fortune, sings, “Who’s afraid of the fallin’ ditch?” Boasting of his optimism, he asks us, “How’s that for the spirit?”, right as the musical background is cheering up.

XX: Sugar ‘n’ Spikes

This song, like “Moonlight on Vermont” and “Veteran’s Day Poppy,” was written earlier than the other songs on TMR; in fact, “Sugar ‘n’ Spikes” was written in late 1967, just a few months after the release of Beefheart’s album, Safe as Milk. So this song sounds far less experimental than the new songs.

“Sugar and spikes” seems to reflect the dual nature of life–sometimes sweet, and sometimes painful. Similar opposition is heard “in neon nights”–sometimes light, and sometimes dark, which is also reflected in “lights in chains”: the pleasure of light vs being bound in chains. This good/bad dichotomy is further heard in “coughin’ smoke, whoopin’ hope.”

So everything is “sugar and spikes…and everything nice and crazy.” Instead of saying that ‘what little girls are made of is sugar and spice and everything nice’ (a totally unrealistic and confining way to describe the female sex), Beefheart more accurately affirms that “what little worlds are made of” is part pleasure and part pain.

Examples of such pleasure combined with pain in the singer’s “little worlds” include being what seems to be an interracial relationship (his “new Friday’s house,” as in a female Friday to Beefheart’s Robinson Crusoe), and all the pleasures that go with such a relationship; and the irritations of having no hot water (“no H on [his] faucet”), or a bed for his mouse. Nonetheless, he’s content as “king for a day with [his] lady, who look fine.” If she’s his “Friday,” I suspect that his being “king for a day” means he’s putting her in a subservient role, as Friday was servant to Crusoe; in other words, in this relationship we see yet again a combination of pleasure and pain…just as in the servile relationship of Beefheart’s band to himself.

Has he given his “honey” a Speidel wristwatch as a gift? Going to see the vicar, he plans, I assume, to marry her, perhaps in a church named after St. Paul or St. Peter.

The only experimental-sounding part of this song occurs with the drum solo after all the words are sung; it’s a frantic solo going at a much faster tempo than that of the guitars and bass, riffs heard also during the music played earlier with the verse beginning with “lies steam stale.”

The song ends with Beefheart singing high-pitched, childlike nonsense syllables that were also heard, and with the same musical backing, in the verse in which he sang “sugar and spikes and everything nice.”

XXI: Ant Man Bee

Musically, this song more directly merges rhythm and blues with more experimental elements, and the blues aspect is made clear right at the beginning, with the guitar riff.

The “Ant Man” of the title indicates that Beefheart is comparing the modern human condition with ants. The white, black, “yella,” and brown ants are obviously meant to represent all the different racial and ethnic groups of the world, who “can’t get along.” We’re all “longin’ to be free…Uhuru!”

Note how the ants are “in God’s garden.” Is this the Garden of Eden, where Adam blamed Eve for tempting him with the forbidden fruit, and she blamed the serpent for the same thing–like the ants, the three couldn’t get along. The Garden of Eden was like Beefheart’s lady’s garden, where the “sweet, sweet bulbs grow.” And it’s the garden of the house where the Magic Band rehearsed the songs of TMR…and Beefheart, in his fiery temper over their mistakes, couldn’t get along with them, either.

“That one lump o’ sugar” that the ants fight over would be the wealth of the world, hoarded by the greedy plutocrat capitalists. And because of their greed, and all the money to be made by the weapons manufacturers, war profiteers, and in the general racket that war has always been, “war still runnin’ on.”

Now, the bee in “Ant Man Bee” is the liberator of us all; he “takes his honey, then he sets the flower free”…and recall how Beefheart loves his flowers. If only the ants could “set each other be,” or let each other be.

With this understanding of the ever-fighting ants, Beefheart goes into more dissonant sax soloing, to represent that never-ending conflict. With two saxes going at the same time, he sounds as if he’s doing an impression of Roland Kirk, with Rockette Morton doing a bass line of D, E, C, A, A (an octave higher).

Side Four

XXII: Orange Claw Hammer

This track is the third of the a cappella songs on TMR. With hard rs from his heavily rhotic pronunciation, Beefheart sounds as if he’s affecting a pirate’s voice. After all, he’s his daughter’s “peg-legged father” whose “seaman’s eyes…flow out water, salt water.”

The setting of this lyric seems to be putting us back in the Depression-era 1930s, since the pirate-singer is a hobo on trains during such economic hard times, and there are references to a Piper Club airplane (built between 1938 and 1947) and Ohio Blue Tip Matches. “The old puff horse” could be the train he’s going on (an iron horse), or it could be himself, puffing on a cigarette he’s lit with the match.

We get a vivid sense of the man’s poverty, with his “clothes in tatters,” though he has “an eagle” US $10 gold coin (issued from US Mint from 1792 to 1933) in his “hole watch pocket.” Another contradiction, in other words. He sees “a gingham girl, baby girl,” who “passed [him] by in tears.” Is this his long-lost daughter?

The song’s title is derived from the sixth verse, in which we get the surrealist lines “an oriole sang like an orange, his breast full o’ worms, and his tail clawed the evenin’ like a hammer” (my emphasis). Are the sights of the oriole and a jackrabbit meant to be omens that the girl he’s met, and willing to do “odd jobs” for, is his daughter?

He tells her he “was once [her] father,” but had to leave her to work in a “roundhouse” (a locomotive maintenance shed, or a cabin on a sailing ship). His poverty and the tyranny of having to search everywhere for work has caused his alienation from her.

She’s “a youngster” compared to him because he’s so old now. He’s so happy to have her back; he wants the “little one” to give him her hand, and (with that gold coin in his pocket, presumably) he’ll “buy [her] a cherry phosphate” (an old name for cherry soda from the late 1800s, using phosphoric acid to add a tangy flavour). Again, details like this bring the narrative back to the 1930s, when these drinks were still popular.

He’ll also take her to where his old ship was moored on “the foamin’ brine and water.” It’s designed with the wooden image of a beautiful, big-breasted goddess “with the pole out, full sail, that tempted away [her] peg-legged father.” Like Odysseus, the pirate-singer was taken away to sea and separated from his family for many, many years, and tempted into the bed of another woman (like Circe or Calypso), “a soft lass with brown skin.” Would she be the “Friday” girl of “Sugar ‘n’ Spikes”?

It seems that, after she “bore [him] seven babies with snappin’ black eyes and beautiful ebony skin,” he abandoned her and their litter, the same way he was “tempted away” to sea, and he abandoned the daughter he is now teary-eyed to see again, after “thirty years away.” Life is, indeed, full of sugar ‘n’ spikes.

Beefheart sings this song in a melody that largely suggests a back-and-forth progression of E minor and D major.

XVIII: Wild Life

“They,” or those who would “take [Beefheart’s] wild life” and “[his] wife” are presumably those in our modernized, industrialized, capitalist society. He wants to live his free, natural life “in [his] lady’s garden,” where the “sweet, sweet bulbs grow.”

Is his wife Ella Guru? Is she the “soft lass with brown skin,” the “Friday” of “Sugar ‘n’ Spikes”? Is she “Big Joan”? Are all of these women the same one, beautiful, yet fat and “too much for [his] mirror”? If she is all of them at once, we have yet more contradiction and paradox on this double album.

This toxic modern society, the spikes taking away his sugar, have already “got [his] mother’s father, and run down all [his] kin,” so he and his wife are next to be taken. To save himself and her, he’s “goin’ up on the mountain for the rest of [his] life.” He’ll find himself a cave, “and talk them bears into takin’ [him] in.” He wants nothing to do with fake modern society.

Small wonder Beefheart lived a cult-like existence with the Magic Band in that house.

As an expression of that wildness that he idealizes, Beefheart does more of his wildly spontaneous soprano sax soloing.

XIV: She’s Too Much for My Mirror

The song opens with a brief monologue by Richard Kunc, saying, “She’s too much for my, or anybody’s, mirror.” According to French, Kunc would make a little joke on every take recorded, this being the one that got included on the album.

This song seems in many ways to be a sequel to “Wild Life,” for “she” is a personification of Chicago, a city of toxic, modern, capitalist decadence that Beefhart wants to leave “for that little red farm.” He yearns for the country life, “remember[ing] the butterflies and the sweet smell o’ corn, and the bubblin’ fish in that lil’ pond.”

The city’s decadent, “floozy”-like ways are “too much for [his] mirror,” that is, they trouble his conscience and self-concept. The capitalists of the city “make a young man a bum,” for Chicago makes him “hungry and cold.” So he’s going up on the mountain, so to speak, for the rest of his life, before Chicago takes his wild life and his wife.

Speaking of her, I said above in my discussion of “Wild Life” that the wife could be Ella Guru, the dark-skinned “Friday” who gave him seven kids, and who was also “too much for [his] mirror.” If so, that he’d take her along, yet leave her (as representing Chicago) would be yet another contradiction. Maybe he loves and hates her at the same time–she’s both “sugar ‘n’ spikes.” Maybe escaping with her to the mountain “before they take [his] wife” is precisely that she is getting to be “too much for [his] mirror,” that is, she is Chicago because she is becoming too much like Chicago, and he needs to restore the Ella Guru in her.

She’s like his mother (in the sense of being an Oedipal transference, or as Mother Nature, the Earth Mother Goddess), who once “told [him he] oughta be choosy,” that is, not settle for less, and be ambitious like the money-making capitalists in Chicago. He thought she was a friend back then, but now he knows “she’s a floozy,” for she’s become a whore for capitalist greed.

So he’s lost the beautiful, natural Ella Guru he once loved. He doesn’t want to return to the Frownland of Chicago, so he longs for “Lucy,” or “Losey,” the woman he did lose to Chicago.

The song begins in E minor, then goes through a number of modulations to other keys, including a few progressions of subdominant to tonic in those new keys. It grows quite dissonant towards the end.

XXV: Hobo Chang Ba

This song is essentially a vignette of a hobo hopping from train to train, or stowing aboard boats, traveling from dawn to dusk. The song could represent someone like the solo singer of “Orange Claw Hammer,” or on “The Dust Blows Forward ‘n’ the Dust Blows Back,” a poor homeless fellow from the Depression era.

With the name “Chang Ba,” is he supposed to be a Chinese-American? If so, thankfully, Beefheart doesn’t affect a racist, stereotypical Chinese accent for his singing voice.

Apart from the usual dissonant guitar jangling, one riff that stands out in this song is an ascending power chord progression of D, E, F♯, then D-E-F♯-D-E.

XXVI: The Blimp (Mousetrapreplica)

We can hear Zappa’s voice at the beginning and the end of this track, in the form of a phone call. Instead of the Magic Band, we hear three of the Mothers of Invention–Roy Estrada on bass, Don Preston on piano, and Art Tripp III on drums, playing a riff in 7/8 time.

The bass is playing sixteenth notes of C-C (then a sixteenth rest), C-C (sixteenth rest), C (sixteenth rest), C-C-B-B-A (sixteenth rest), with the piano playing a C major triad with the fifth going up to a sixth to make a C sixth chord during the bass notes of C-C-B-B-A. The drums are playing a beat to parallel exactly the bass and piano.

Over this music, we hear Antennae Jimmy Semens reciting Beefheart’s poetry, which is an account–of sorts–of the crashing of the Hindenburg (“the blimp”). Semens’s hysterical reciting might remind us of the news reporter, Herbert Morrison, and his emotional, eyewitness response to the disaster (“Oh, the humanity!”, etc.). Semens is addressing Zappa, calling him “Frank,” as he speaks.

The comical nature of this track suggests that the crashing of the Hindenburg is just a metaphor for a “blimp” like Big Joan, or some other such “bulbous” person.

XXVII: Steal Softly Through Snow

This song begins with a guitar riff in 3/4, then a few dissonant chords, and Beefheart begins singing.

He is saddened to have both his reflection in a mirror and the moon obscured from his view. In other words, he is being prevented from engaging in introspection and from contemplating his Jungian anima, as represented in the moon goddess: recall how in a number of the previous TMR songs we’ve looked at, Beefheart derives happiness from such objects as the moon, the sun, and flowers.

He would “steal softly through sunshine” and “snow,” that is, he’d move stealthily through all of life’s happy and unhappy moments, or to be able to cope with life successfully. He wishes he could escape “the winter of our discontent” the way a goose can just fly away from it, but sadly, of course, he can’t. So all he can do is “steal softly through” life’s ups and downs.

Swans, which are largely monogamous throughout their lives, “live two hundred years of love, they’re one,” so he is saddened “to see them cross the sun,” that is, to see them enjoy its light, warmth, and love, knowing he can’t go and enjoy it, too, for he has to stay in a loveless, alienating world in which relationships break up all too often.

There’s more of Beefheart’s wordplay in “grain grows, rainbows,” expressing more of his delight in nature, “up straw hill.” It “breaks [his] heart to see the highway cross the hill,” that is, to see the destruction of nature in the paving and tarring of the ground. Man has lived for millennia, “and still he kills.” Beefheart “can’t go” into a state of introspection in front of a mirror covered with “black paper.” All he can do is sneak about between the happiness of sunshine and the sadness of snow.

XXVIII: Old Fart at Play

This track, originally intended as an instrumental, was to have the title, “My Business Is the Truth, Your Business Is a Lie.” Zappa, however, insisted on adding vocals to the track, and made Beefheart relent, so the latter recited a narrative over the music.

Beefheart is likely referring to himself as “the old fart,” wearing “his wooden fish-head,” a “very intricate rainbow trout replica”…hence the title of the album and the cover, on which Beefheart is holding a fish-head mask in front of his face. “The old fart was smart,” for “only he noticed” things that others can’t, the trout mask apparently helping him see better.

“The fish-head broke the window” to the kitchen where “mama was flattening lard with her red enameled rolling pin.” So his insight into the world, given to him through the trout mask, breaks into our normal world, where people like mama engage in domestic drudgery, and shakes up the established order.

His sense of smell is improved, too, thanks to “his important breather holes” on the mask. It’s odd that he is “now breathin’ freely” through “the nose of the wooden mask,” just as it is odd that he’d see better with the mask on his face, noticing things better than other people can. Yet such is the contradictory, paradoxical nature of TMR, and why the title and cover for the album are so fitting.

With this better insight into the nature of things thanks to his mask, “an assortment of observations took place.” Mama, who had originally just been doing the usual domestic servitude that women have traditionally been doomed to because of the patriarchal family, is now engaging in odd, but creative and liberating behaviour: she’s “licked her lips like a cat [enjoying pleasure, for once], pecked the ground like a rooster [a male fowl, symbolically implying a switch from the female to the male role, liberating her from her role’s limitations], pivoted like a duck [moved around and shifted away from her old ways, that is, she’s trying new things],” etc. His fish-head having broken the window, like breaking the glass ceiling, has freed mama from her traditional sex role.

“The old fart smelled this” liberation, and he, too, is liberated, “now breathin’ freely.” When you free others, you free yourself.

XXIX: Veteran’s Day Poppy

This is the third of the three earlier-composed-and-recorded tracks on this album, along with “Moonlight on Vermont” and “Sugar ‘n’ Spikes.” And as I said above, like the other two, this song is less experimental than the rest of the music on TMR…except for a few dissonant chords during the second half of the song, a plaintive instrumental section in 3/4.

The first half of the song sounds more upbeat and blues-rock oriented, more in keeping with Beefheart’s pre-TMR style. While Beefheart is singing the brief verse, one of the guitarists is playing a melody Gene Autry sang in the song, “El Rancho Grande,” a cheerful little tune.

Beefheart is singing about a mother who is mourning the death of her son, who died in WWI, and so she doesn’t want to wear a poppy on Veteran’s Day. So this song is another antiwar one, like “Dachau Blues,” and one opposed to all the hate and competition between different ethnic and racial groups, as in “Ant Man Bee.” This sadness, nonetheless, is heard over–as I said above–such an upbeat groove as to be yet another paradoxical, contradictory moment on TMR.

XXX: Conclusion

When I speak of the contradictory, paradoxical, and incongruent nature of the themes of TMR, I’m not trying to be disparaging of the album. On the contrary, these elements are among what’s crucial to what makes TMR great, for they reflect what life is all about. Everything, properly understood, is in dialectical contradiction. To understand something fully, one must be willing to see it from all perspectives, for reality is incongruous, never clear-cut.

TMR, therefore, is a great album not just because it is so advanced in its musical experimentation, but also in its joyful embrace of paradoxes. It’s musically advanced, yet it has a wonderful, childlike quality about it. It’s “awful-sounding,” yet it’s musical genius. It’s sugar ‘n’ spikes, and everything nice and crazy, for that’s what little worlds are made of.

Great art of any kind has a universal quality to it, and TMR, with its paradoxical embrace of both sides of everything, has that universality.

The Tanah: Crests–Chapter Three

[The following is the forty-sixth of many posts–here is the first, here is the second, here is the third, here is the fourth, here is the fifth, here is the sixth, here is the seventh, here is the eighth, here is the ninth, here is the tenth, here is the eleventh, here is the twelfth, here is the thirteenth, here is the fourteenth, here is the fifteenth, here is the sixteenth, here is the seventeenth, here is the eighteenth, here is the nineteenth, here is the twentieth, here is the twenty-first, here is the twenty-second, here is the twenty-third, here is the twenty-fourth, here is the twenty-fifth, here is the twenty-sixth, here is the twenty-seventh, here is the twenty-eighth, here is the twenty-ninth, here is the thirtieth, here is the thirty-first, here is the thirty-second, here is the thirty-third, here is the thirty-fourth, here is the thirty-fifth, here is the thirty-sixth, here is the thirty-seventh, here is the thirty-eighth, here is the thirty-ninth, here is the fortieth, here is the forty-first, here is the forty-second, here is the forty-third, here is the forty-fourth, and here is the forty-fifth–about a fictitious discovery of ancient manuscripts of a religious text of narratives and magic spells. Its purpose for my readers and me is to provide a cosmology and mythography on which I am basing much, if not most, of my fiction–short stories and novels. If anyone is interested in reading this fiction, he or she can use these blog posts as references to explain the nature of the magic and universe in my fiction.]

Translator’s Introduction

This chapter is the last of the Crests. It is also the last of the texts of the Tanah to be translated…for now, until more have been discovered, to be translated and commented on when the time comes.

As has been explained in the commentary on earlier chapters, this crest is an ambiguous one. What is to become of humanity after the third and most terrible trough? Is man to be reborn in a new, peaceful world, or is he to exist only in a spiritual, nirvana-like state in the oneness of Cao? The elders of the tribe who saw the vision of this final crest do not know. The reader will have to decide for him- or herself.

Chapter Three

The last vision that we elders had, the final crest, was difficult to interpret. What was the true nature of the peace that we saw? Was it the quiet of man no longer fighting his brother, or was it the quiet of man no longer in existence, since death is often the highest peace, the one true escape from pain? Our uncertainty was chilling.

We saw flatlands with no plants or animals. We saw only barren desert waste and rock. Total silence. Not a single man, woman, or child could be seen anywhere, near or far, to populate the land.

Still, we could feel humanity; the souls of all people were a vibration throughout the air. These souls were all one, united in peace, with no bodies to make them seen or heard. Still, that collective soul was there, all in harmony.

Finally, after a long wait, what seemed like years, maybe hundreds or thousands of years, we saw the beginning growth of green, a tiny plant. Our vision thus ended.

We asked each other many questions about what we saw. Will the Pluries fall again, animating the rain with divine spirit and life? Would this plant we saw be the first of many more to come? Would new animal life come after the plants? And then, at last, would man reappear, to live in peace and harmony with his brother?

We can only hope so.

If not, may the united souls of man, in that vibration in the air, remain in peace by always being at one with Cao.

Billionaires Should Not Exist!

Photo by Markus Winkler on Pexels.com

I: Introduction

A couple of weeks before I started writing this post, I came upon a short video posted on Twitter (I refuse to call that social media website by its moronic renaming!) on which Elon Musk was complaining about having to pay too much in taxes. Good God: who would imagine the richest man in the world, a centi-billionaire, upset about that? The super-rich would never go on campaigns to lower their taxes, would they?

Well, of course, such complaining is only to be expected of him and his ilk. But matters get worse when we encounter ordinary people defending these plutocrats, which I promptly found myself having to deal with after replying to the video by saying that people like Musk pay far too little in taxes, which of course they usually do–that’s how they became centi-billionaires in the first place.

Musk’s defender was someone who calls him- (or her-) self “chronically based” (“chronically bird-brained” is more like it). The person in question replied to my comment by saying that Musk pays “absurdly” high taxes, “in the billions.” I took a quick look at the defender’s Twitter page, which included, under the name, what probably shouldn’t be all that surprising–a Bible quote: “With man this is impossible, but with God, all things are possible” (Matthew 19:26). Right-wingers are often fond of their feel-good Christian quotes.

I responded to all of this by pointing out the oft-noticed link between Bible-thumpers and billionaire-simping right-wingers, adding that this person ought to read this quote from Matthew–25:31-46, which shows a concern for the poor, something right-wingers routinely ignore.

Well, I suppose this person got a little upset by my reply. First, he or she wanted to know if I’m any better when it comes to caring about the poor (by not defending the super-rich, I’m already better without a need to do anything else!). Then, after citing a few more debatable statistics about the tax rates of the rich vs average-income Americans, which I consider neither here nor there, he or she claimed that higher taxes would just drive the super-rich out of the country, leaving the US government to default, since average-income Americans wouldn’t be able to carry the burden of such high taxes.

Let me deal with these objections one by one. There was no point in my saying any of the following in a reply on Twitter, since I’ve no need to prove myself to this nitwit (who probably wouldn’t listen to me, anyway), and my claims of charity couldn’t be verified independently, anyway. But suffice it to say, for years, I donated money monthly to World Vision to a boy in Nicaragua named José Eliel Angulo; and as a leftist, I constantly advocate for the poor. This right-winger said nothing of helping the poor; just billionaire-simping. I’ve already done leaps and bounds more, even with my modest charity as a chronically-underemployed worker (ever since covid), than he or she.

Photo by Tima Miroshnichenko on Pexels.com

II: Musk’s Wealth and Taxes

Next, we should look at the claim that Musk pays an “absurdly” high amount in taxes, “in the billions.” Let’s start with some context: Musk‘s net worth, as of this writing in May 2026, is $788 billion, according to Forbes; his net worth was $800 billion in February 2026. In 2021, his net worth, again, according to Forbes, was $300 billion. His total in net worth billions rose by a billion yearly, if not almost monthly, from 2024 to 2026. Since November 2025, he’s been expecting a Tesla pay package of $1 trillion, if approved, over a period of ten years, if he meets specific goals.

Note that net worth is, of course, after taxes. In 2021, he had to pay about $11 billion in taxes (while Tesla paid none), yet his net worth had been $300 billion. Given his gargantuan wealth at the time already, I think he could handle a tax on 28.27% (311/11) of his wealth–it doesn’t seem all that “absurdly” high to me. It was also just one year. He paid no federal income taxes in 2018, by the way. From 2014-2018, he paid $455 million in taxes on $1.52 billion of income.

As much of his wealth is in stock rather than salary, his tax liabilities often arise only when he sells shares, allowing him to defer taxes. In 2026, he said he’d have to pay a combined federal and state income tax rate of around 45% when selling stock. Well, don’t sell the stock, then, Elon, if you hate taxes so much.

Incidentally, Tesla paid 0% in federal income taxes, in 2025, on $5.7 billion of US income. Indeed, in spite of high profits, Tesla has utilized tax breaks, resulting in a low effective tax rate in recent years.

Furthermore, ever since Trump‘s second term, the super-rich have seen huge increases in their wealth, up roughly $1.5 trillion in 2025, about 22%, from $6.7 trillion to $8.2 trillion. Musk, Jeff Bezos, Larry Ellison, and Mark Zuckerberg made up about a quarter of the total gains. Much of these gains were, of course, because of Trump’s tax cuts to the rich. A study last year showed that, in spite of the super-rich paying an overall larger share of taxes than ordinary Americans, the former pay a lower tax rate than the latter. The super-rich are not paying their fair share.

Ultimately, though, who pays how much in taxes is neither here nor there when you consider how everyone ends up after the taxes are paid. Oligarchs like Musk, Bezos, et al are still obscenely wealthy, while millions of working-class Americans are struggling to make ends meet. We all know where far too much of that tax revenue goes–to the military, to Israel, to the US/NATO proxy war against Russia (using Ukraine as a stick with which to hit Putin), and the like, in disproportion to how much should go there…if any of it. Far too little of that money is going out to help the poor.

And the rich won’t leave the US if taxed more…they own the country! They simply won’t pay. We cannot legislate them out of their wealth. That’s why I advocate forcible expropriation (via socialist revolution), and not taxation, anyway.

A huge part of the reason that so many of the super-rich (the tech-bros in particular, like Musk et al) are supporting Trump in his second term is surely because of those delicious tax cuts his administration has given them. When Musk is in a video talking about how ‘awfully high’ taxes are in the US, what he’s really trying to say is that he simply wants to get them even lower than they currently are.

Musk currently has ambitions of being the world’s first trillionaire, as Tesla’s pay package, mentioned above, may make him. We have a word to describe such ambitions: GREED.

This leads me to take a proper look now at the psychology of the super-rich.

Photo by Guillermo Berlin on Pexels.com

III: Billionaires Are Different from the Rest of Us

Yes, the title of this section is ridiculously obvious in its truth, but I need to state it in reaction to something that chronically bird-brained said in one of his or her comments Apparently, the rich are the same as the rest of us and ought to be treated the same as us.

lol wut?

It doesn’t take a genius to realize that acquiring huge amounts of wealth changes you psychologically, and in a profound way. You become more selfish, acquisitive, narcissistic, entitled, and you lose much in empathy for others. It’s easy to see why people like Musk want even lower taxes than they currently have to pay.

Several years ago, I wrote an article on how those benefitting from capitalism tend to exhibit narcissistic personality traits. Many of the super-rich are so devoid of empathy and basic decency that they can be reasonably called sociopathic.

Consider how Jeff Bezos’s company, Amazon, has pressured their workers to deliver products so quickly that, lacking time to go to the bathroom, they have to piss in bottles as they’re driving to deliver! Then there’s Musk himself, who in response to 2019’s fascist takeover of the Bolivian government (with its accompanying violence to those Bolivians opposed to the new right-wing government) and the left-wing protests against it, he said, “We will coup whoever we want. Deal with it!”

Finally, there’s that billionaire psychopath Alex Karp, CEO of Palantir, whose AI is currently used to help the IDF kill Palestinians and Lebanese, and which will also be used in data centres for mass surveillance of everybody. He’s spoken bluntly of the ‘superiority’ of Western civilization and the need to defend it, necessitating scaring our ‘enemies’ so we can “on occasion kill them.” Such notions are in Palantir’s 22-point manifesto. And Palantir co-founder/Trump supporter Peter Thiel speaks out against democracy.

We all have dark, selfish thoughts deep down: Freud‘s id, and Jung’s Shadow. What distinguishes us from the super-rich is that they can afford to fulfill their darkest desires. That’s why billionaires shouldn’t exist. This is just common sense.

Those guilty of the disgusting and highly disturbing Epstein crimes weren’t and aren’t necessarily billionaires, but they’re certainly rich enough to have partaken. They, who raped and sexually exploited underage girls, among other atrocities, clearly regard common people as mere toys to be played around with, mere meat, not as human beings.

This sort of wickedness is why people like me are opposed to the whole idea of being born into a lower class, a middle class, or an upper class. One tends to stay where one is: those at the bottom generally cannot escape poverty, those in the middle are driven to work like slaves out of a fear of falling to the bottom, and those at the top, never learning what it’s like to struggle to live, go through life entitled, thinking they should be able to have anything they want and never be held accountable for any wrongdoing.

Such an entitled attitude is easily seen in people like Trump, who’ll “grab ’em by the pussy,” and never release the Epstein files, in which his name is mentioned tens of thousands of times. Billionaires are people who can buy a home, a private plane, cars, etc. quite fast and easily, as compared with how the rest of us would struggle, scrimp, and save to afford any one of those things. One billion is a thousand millions: people need to use their imaginations and think about what one can do with that much money. If a million dollars were seconds, they would add up to a little over 11.5 days. If a billion dollars were seconds, they would add up to about 31.7 years; and if a trillion dollars (Musk’s current ambition) were seconds, they would add up to about 31,710 years. I hope these calculations help the skeptics understand why we call such amounts of money obscene levels of wealth.

No, billionaires are not the same as the rest of us. We aren’t even in the same league as they are.

Some may try to defend billionaires by referring to their acts of ‘philanthropy.’ Their ‘charitable’ acts, however, require closer scrutiny. Only a small amount of that money actually goes to helping the poor; when donations are given to schools, for example, they usually go to elite ones. A lot of the motive behind the giving is for tax breaks and an improved public image. Most importantly, this ‘charity’ only serves to justify keeping the class system as it is instead of properly addressing the real root causes of poverty–those of capitalism.

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation may have done a lot to reduce the problem of polio, but that was far from the biggest problem of the local people, to give one example. That foundation is also not all that noble in its agenda: among other things, Gates’s ‘giving’ allowed his net worth to go up every year since 2009 to $72 billion as of 2014. It’s currently at $102-108 billion. Some charity.

If expropriated, billionaires’ wealth could help end world hunger, build schools and hospitals in the Third World–ones that are fully equipped and with well-trained staff–it could provide affordable if not free housing for everyone, and could be used to clean up the planet. All their combined wealth is around $16 to $20 trillion: don’t tell me it couldn’t at least make huge strides at achieving, if not completely achieve, the above goals.

Instead of even trying to achieve those oh, so worthy goals, however, what kinds of things do the super-rich do with their wealth, besides hoarding it in offshore bank accounts to avoid taxes (i.e., the Panama and Paradise Papers), to pushing for even more tax breaks, lobbying for Israel, etc.? Well, in the case of Musk, Bezos, and Richard Branson of the Virgin Group, they go into private space exploration! What do we need that for, when we have NASA?

What good are fantasies about colonizing space when we won’t even solve the ecological problems of this planet? Even if we achieve the technological miracle of science fiction’s terraforming, isn’t it true that we’ll just mess up the environment out there on those planets, too, sooner or later?

The motives of these three private space explorers is obvious: it isn’t out of altruism: it’s just a glorification of their already bloated egos. No, billionaires are not the same as the rest of us. They are, in fact, monstrosities.

Photo by Brett Sayles on Pexels.com

IV: Billionaires Buy Power and Kill Democracy

The idiotic dogma of the market fundamentalists is that with minimal-to-no government intervention in the economy, the “free market” as a ‘natural,’ ‘organic,’ and ‘self-regulating’ way of doing things will set everything right. Lower taxes, deregulate business practices, and businessmen’s “rational egoism” will motivate them to produce the best quality goods to satisfy customer demand, resulting in a healthy economy with lots of jobs for everyone. Wealth will “trickle down” to the poor, and everyone will be happy.

The last fifty-or-so years have shown that the truth is anything but the nonsense described above. When taxes are lowered and the economy is deregulated to maximize profits, far from resulting in the right-wing libertarian’s “free market” utopia, millionaires become billionaires and their private property balloons, requiring the super-rich to protect it all the more through the very state that they claim they want to minimize. Hence all the rich’s lobbying of American politicians through super PACs, resulting in legislation to benefit the rich at the expense of the poor. Hence the proliferation of militarized police. And hence, when markets dry up here and need to be developed abroad, the need to export capital to other countries, fueling imperialism and war.

As I explained here years ago, the “free market” doesn’t result in “small government”; it results in huge government (i.e., the bloated military-industrial complex). As Tupac once said, “They got money for wars, but can’t feed the poor.” When right-wing libertarians talk about “small government,” what they really mean is cutting social programs; spending absurdly high amounts on the military, though, as if there were no tomorrow, is perfectly acceptable to them. Their notions of being “frugal” and not wasteful with government money is pure hypocrisy. It’s not “small government”; it’s capitalist government.

This is why the US has a multi-trillion-dollar deficit because of such things as military spending that’s through the roof, resulting in a “need” to raise the debt ceiling, yet there are all these cuts in education and the like. Landlords have raised rents, resulting in a rise in homelessness to an epidemic level, exacerbated recently by the inflation caused by Trump’s tariffs and his needless war of aggression on Iran (spiking oil and gas prices).

Tariffs, of course, are taxes on imported goods. While Trump has lowered taxes on the super-rich, hence the backing of his reelection campaign by Musk et al, the poor are being burdened with the taxes of these tariffs, and the poor in the US are already having difficulty making ends meet as it is. All of these injustices are the result of allowing the super-rich to have too much political influence, making them get richer and richer, while the rest of us get poorer and poorer.

Real democracy means giving power to the common people, not this sham we see of voting for whoever the oligarchs allow us to vote for every four or so years, and yet the pro-rich, anti-poor policies continue unchecked. In these ways, we can see how, in buying political power, the billionaires are killing democracy.

Any candidate offering a real alternative to the system gets marginalized. Scant media attention is ever given to the Green Party, for example, and even the modest social-democrat reforms proposed by Bernie Sanders, AOC, etc., are stopped before they can even be seriously considered. Sanders can be counted on to bow down and endorse yet another corporate whore of the Democratic Party during the lead-up to any election because he is just a sheep-dog for the left. He and AOC, in spite of the lip service they pay to criticizing Israel, are Zionists: any American politician who wants to have a successful career must be firmly Zionist, as Israel has always been crucial in helping protect the interests of Western imperialism.

This is all why, outside of revolution and expropriating all of the billionaires, the poor will never have a hope of improving their lot. The super-rich will never pay their fair share in taxes, and they’ll continue to lobby for even lower taxes. They do this because they own the country. They are killing, if they haven’t yet already fully killed, democracy.

The fact that Trump recently visited China accompanied by oligarchs like Musk and Jensen Huang of Nvidia is telling. Trump is one of these oligarchs, and he serves the oligarchs, who truly rule the US. They are caving into China because they know that China, home to many of the coveted rare earth minerals and other natural resources essential to propping up American industries like AI, etc., has the upper hand.

The link between billionaires and AI leads me to my next point.

Photo by Oktay Ku00f6seou011flu on Pexels.com

V: Billionaires Want to Surveil Us

Along with the idea that today’s US government is a big, capitalist one is the fact that this state is getting increasingly fascistic and totalitarian. As I discussed in this article, what is feared of communism is here in capitalism: attacks on freedom and democracy–touched on in the previous section, but I go into more detail in this other article; cults of personality (i.e., Trump), police brutality, concentration camps, and mass murder (again, see my article for details); and finally, surveillance, which is what I want to get into here now.

As the working class gets more and more frustrated and desperate, they will start lashing out and thinking about revolution. The super-rich, naturally, are getting nervous about that, as we can see from such things as Luigi‘s shooting of the health insurance billionaire, the burning down of warehouses, and Sam Altman’s house being hit with a Molotov cocktail.

The tech bros among the billionaires have been setting up AI data centres in places all over the US, which apart from using up needed water and energy are also being used to collect data and info on everyone. So anyone who, as the AI finds out from all of this personal information, is in any way involved in organizing resistance to the capitalist, imperialist system, who is agitating and educating (as I try to do here), and/or is planning anything of a revolutionary nature has thus made him- or herself a target. Big Business is watching you.

Note that at least one of these oligarchs, Larry Fink, billionaire CEO of BlackRock, has vocally expressed his concern about “domestic terrorism” in the event of a possible civilian use of drones to strike these data centers, an act of resistance against the growing totalitarian capitalist state. Note also that Fink was one of the oligarchs who went with Trump, Musk, Huang, et al to China. And note further that BlackRock, along with Vanguard and State Street, is one of those giant, multinational investment companies that own and control just about every business on the planet.

These billionaires are becoming truly scary people. Taxing them more doesn’t even begin to address the need to rein them in. Why do you think Musk brazenly did a Nazi salute on TV at the time of Trump’s inauguration? Was he just being foolish or ‘socially awkward’? Doing such a thing thirty years ago would have been political suicide. Now, at worst, Musk has received something of a public shaming (like most of the Epstein criminals), but there haven’t been any real harsh consequences to his life and career. He did the salute because he knew that with the ascent of Trump, fascism has arrived fully formed in the US, and Musk figures there’s nothing any of us at the bottom can do about it.

This helplessness of ours brings me to my next point.

VI: Genocide as Suppression of Resistance

The “terrorism” of Hamas and Hezbollah should be understood as resistance against the ongoing Israeli settler-colonialism, occupation, and oppression of the Palestinians. The UN has acknowledged that armed resistance against an occupying force is legitimate self-defense. To the extent that the events of October 7th, 2023 were the acts of Hamas, as opposed to the Hannibal Directive, we can see those events as part of that resistance; for as those of us who have read the history know, this conflict didn’t start on Oct. 7.

While the Zionists have made life for the Palestinians an unending hell ever since the foundation of Israel in 1948, the ethnic cleansing of those in Gaza and the West Bank has been particularly shocking to watch on live-streamed video and photos since Oct. 7. Bodies buried under the rubble of destroyed buildings all over Gaza, children having lost limbs and their bodies torn apart, traumatized survivors everywhere, people dying of starvation, a lack of housing and medical care…all because the IDF looks on the victims with a Hitler hate.

Now of course, the international reaction from ordinary people like me to all of these horrors has been one of sheer outrage, but apart from protesting and attempts to bring food and medical relief to the victims, we cannot stop the Israelis, the great majority of whom support Netanyahu and his thugs in their non-stop murder, which has now extended itself to southern Lebanon. The people in power who really could have stopped Israel–such as, first, Biden and Harris, and now, the Trump administration–have done nothing. They have all been perfectly content to allow the killing to continue. Again, as with Sanders and AOC, they may pay lip service to how awful the violence is, but they’ll do nothing of consequence to stop the violence.

Note that this support of Israel is not limited to the United States government. The former prime minister of my country, Justin Trudeau, proudly called himself a Zionist while this killing was going on; like so many others, he was more concerned with “antisemitism” (never mind that many Jews are anti-Zionists, and many non-Jews are Zionists). Similarly, you can find video of German police beating the shit out of pro-Palestine protestors, who include women.

The Middle East is geostrategically very important to the US and the rest of the Western Empire, as I went into here...all that oil! It’s extremely vital to the imperialists to have an ally–Israel–to kick ass in the region, as then-senator Biden said in a speech back in 1986 (not with my choice of words, of course, but the same idea).

Photo by Monirul Islam on Pexels.co

Therefore, not even protests against Israeli brutality against the Palestinians–and now against Lebanese–is acceptable to the Western powers-that-be…to say nothing of a military intervention from those powers to stop the Zionist slaughter. And so the accusation of “antisemitism” is such a convenient excuse for those powerful people to use to stifle the protests (and so it’s important that we protestors not fall into the trap of generalizing about “the Jews” when we protest the evils of Zionism…such generalizing only gives those powerful people more ammunition against us).

When we consider how Israel–apart from a public shaming–is continuing their persecution of the Palestinians with impunity, we must also consider another, even scarier idea: the ongoing genocide of Gaza, the West Bank, and now southern Lebanon is clearly a template for how all resistance–anywhere in the world–will be dealt with.

Consider the current situation in Cuba. The island has already suffered an economic embargo since 1960 for committing the unforgivable sin of kicking out the capitalists on New Year’s Day, 1959, and embracing Marxism-Leninism. Now, the Trump administration has been cutting off Cuba’s acess to vital materials for its people’s survival–no fuel or oil, widespread blackouts, difficulty in securing the financing and logistics to import basic food, medicine, and agricultural inputs. There are even Cuban fears of a US military invasion. If the American government is allowed to have its way in these acts of aggression, this will mean yet another genocide.

So what’s happening in Palestine, southern Lebanon, and Cuba is adding up to a dangerous set of precedents. Genocide will be the punishment for resistance against capitalism, imperialism, and settler-colonialism. Imperialism has always been violent, cruel, and bloodthirsty, but not on such a brazen level. And who do these imperialists ultimately serve? The capitalist class, at the top of whom are the billionaires…which leads me to my next point.

VII: The Rich Fuel Imperialism

In Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism, Lenin explained how the interlacing of bank and industrial capital, creating a financial oligarchy, has financial capital generate profits from the exploitation colonialism inherent in imperialism. Note that these imperialist wars and coups d’état are not just “government stuff.” The bourgeois government merely manages the affairs of the capitalist class. In other words, it’s really the rich who fuel imperialism.

Photo by Saifee Art on Pexels.com

Consider again Musk’s tweet in response to protests over Áñez‘s far-right takeover in Bolivia in 2019: “We will coup whoever we want! Deal with it.” He said the quiet part out loud here: it was his coveting of Bolivian lithium (and that of other oligarchs–including those among Western carmakers and investors [including U.S. firms], and various private technology corporations) that motivated at least some of them to aid in the right-wing coup and removal of Evo Morales from power.

Then there’s the real motive behind the kidnapping of Nicolas Maduro and his wife: not that nonsense about arresting him on bogus charges of drug trafficking, but to steal Venezuelan oil, which is what Trump has been doing (making his claim that it was Venezuela that was stealing from the US pure projection). The US government and the capitalists it serves have been coveting that oil for years, since Venezuela has the largest oil reserves in the world.

On top of all of this, the Big Three asset managers–BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street (note the extent of their influence on corporate America)–have substantial investments in the defence sector, including Lockheed-Martin, Raytheon Technologies, and Northrop Grumman. We don’t know exact numbers here, but estimates suggest the Big Three’s combined holdings could be in the hundreds of billions of dollars. These defence contractors are profiting from wars like the one in Iran.

While oligarchs like Musk, Bezos, Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, and Warren Buffet don’t hold significant direct public stock portfolios in legacy defence contractors like Lockheed-Martin or RTX, Musk’s Starlink, for example, has been used to help Ukraine in the US/NATO proxy war on Russia; Starlink has also been used to help Israel. Amazon, under Bezos, secured a massive contract (Project Nimbus) to provide cloud services for the Israeli government and military. Gates’s Microsoft has a notable cybersecurity and technology footprint in Israel. Buffett, a strong supporter of the Israeli economy, is heavily invested in Israeli businesses like Iscar. The fact that the super-wealthy have, in one way or another, been involved in imperialism and Zionism is all the more reason to be opposed to the very existence of billionaires.

VIII: Conclusion

All of the above reasons should demonstrate that there is no sound reason to regard billionaires as anything like the rest of us, or that we should treat them as we would anyone else…except that they should be reduced in wealth to that of the average citizen, at least. Billionaires need to be much more than merely taxed heavily: they should be expropriated–they should not exist as such. Reduce them to the status of multi-millionaires at the very most…and that is already being very generous to them. (I would, incidentally, extend this reduction to Chinese billionaires, too. Fair is fair.)

Another thing worthy of mention–though I won’t go into detail about it here, since I already did so in section III of this article–is the undue influence of the super-rich on the media. You can go to the link for the details.

Of course, forcible expropriation of the super-rich is easier said than done. In fact, with AI surveillance data centres keeping tabs on all of us, militarized police and ICE ready to beat the shit out of us, as well as those scary robot dogs, etc., the achievement of the needed expropriation seems bordering on impossible. Still, we can’t just sit on our hands and wail in despair. Things will continue to get worse if we let them. We have nothing to lose but our chains.

Elsewhere, there is hope in the decline of the American empire and de-dollarization. As Rosa Luxemburg once said, “Before a revolution happens, it is perceived as impossible; after it happens, it is seen as having been inevitable.” Let’s find comfort in those thoughts.

‘Just Beneath Your Boat,’ the Horror Anthology with My Short Story, ‘Scylla,’ Has Been Published!

Just Beneath Your Boat: Tales of Aquatic Terror Edited by: Thomas Folske, has been published on Amazon today, May 17th. Presented by Dark Moon Rising Publications, the anthology has my short story, ‘Scylla,’ in it.

My story is about a family going out in a yacht, but the father works in a big company that is polluting the ocean to cut costs and maximize profits. Certain supernatural forces in the ocean, however, want to take their revenge not only on him but also on his whole family, using the plastic dumped in the ocean to construct a huge…abomination…to kill them.

Other great writers in the anthology include the following:

Stephen A. Roddewig
Jeff Parsons 
Lillian Csernica
Rob Tannahill
Claire Davon
LJ Jacobs
Milan Simić
Justin Carlos Alcala
Denise Landry 
Blake Hoss
David McDonald 
CJ Hooper
Pip Pinkerton 
Dino Parenti
Don Anelli
Matthew Chabin
Kasey Hill 
DJ Tyrer 
Miguel Fliguer
Thomas Folske
Michael Mortimer
Margaret Eve

Also, there is artwork from:

Alhiya Hoffman
Amelia Folske
Ben Merk
Blake Hoss
Kelsey Grimmell
Michelle Hanson 
Milan Simić
Olivia Davis
Sidney Shiv 
Todor Gotchkov
Warren Muzak

So, go get yourself a copy of this great book! Its’ also to be published on Kobo and OverDrive libraries, possibly also even on hoopla. I mention these alternatives for those who’d like to buy the book, but who don’t want to give Jeff Bezos their money. 

😉

My Short Story, ‘Cao,’ in the ‘Beast Under Your Bed, Vol. 1’ Anthology, is Published!

Beast Under Your Bed, Vol. 1: A YA Horror Anthology, from Dark Moon Rising Publications, has my short story, ‘Cao,’ in it. The book has been published on Amazon. Because the stories are written for teens, there are no naughty words or other adult content.

My story is about Timmy, a sensitive boy who feels a mystical connection with Cao, the unifying energy field of the entire universe. It keeps telling him it is going to take him away. He’s terrified of it…but will going away really be a bad thing, given his abusive parents and the bullying he suffers at school? Will being taken away be his damnation, or his salvation? Read and find out!

There are lots of other great writers in this anthology, one of whom is Megan Guilliams, the curator of the book. All of us writers are as you can see below:

You can also see other publishers of the anthology, if you don’t want to give Jeff Bezos your money. Go get yourself a copy of this great book as soon as you can! 🙂

The Tanah: Crests–Chapter Two

[The following is the forty-fifth of many posts–here is the first, here is the second, here is the third, here is the fourth, here is the fifth, here is the sixth, here is the seventh, here is the eighth, here is the ninth, here is the tenth, here is the eleventh, here is the twelfth, here is the thirteenth, here is the fourteenth, here is the fifteenth, here is the sixteenth, here is the seventeenth, here is the eighteenth, here is the nineteenth, here is the twentieth, here is the twenty-first, here is the twenty-second, here is the twenty-third, here is the twenty-fourth, here is the twenty-fifth, here is the twenty-sixth, here is the twenty-seventh, here is the twenty-eighth, here is the twenty-ninth, here is the thirtieth, here is the thirty-first, here is the thirty-second, here is the thirty-third, here is the thirty-fourth, here is the thirty-fifth, here is the thirty-sixth, here is the thirty-seventh, here is the thirty-eighth, here is the thirty-ninth, here is the fortieth, here is the forty-first, here is the forty-second, here is the forty-third, and here is the forty-fourth–about a fictitious discovery of ancient manuscripts of a religious text of narratives and magic spells. Its purpose for my readers and me is to provide a cosmology and mythography on which I am basing much, if not most, of my fiction–short stories and novels. If anyone is interested in reading this fiction, he or she can use these blog posts as references to explain the nature of the magic and universe in my fiction.]

Translator’s Introduction

This chapter, too, seems eerily prophetic. It seems to predict not only the French Revolution and the rise and fall of Napoleon (or are our researchers letting their imaginations run wild here?), but also the end of the Commons due to enclosure, forcing English farmers to enter cities to work in factories. We’ll let you decide if our researchers’ speculations are correct.

Chapter Two

The next crest we saw in our visions would be a short one–so short as almost to seem non-existent. Indeed, this crest seemed almost to overlap with a trough, and to overlap almost fully.

Those who wore the bracelets came to hate them, suspecting rightly that it was the bracelets that were the creators of their woe. So when the time came that the bracelets would no longer stick to their skin, and the wearers were to feel compelled to pass them on to be worn by the next generation, the wearers, having finally become able to remove the bracelets from their wrists, resisted giving them to their sons and daughters. They felt a terrible headache from their resistance, but they prevailed all the same, not knowing the Crims or their divine power in the bracelets.

This unwitting disobedience to the Crims–the people’s not knowing that it was to be the Crims who decided when the wearing of the bracelets would end, and not the people to decide–would result in good and ill fortune at nearly the same time. True, the ill fortune of servitude to the lords of the land would end, the curse of wearing the bracelets, but a new ill fortune would creep up on the unsuspecting people, their punishment for rejecting and discarding the bracelets before the time the Crims deemed a fit one.

The people with naked wrists rejoiced at the cutting off of the heads of their oppressive kings and queens. They rejoiced no longer to have to work on land owned by lords who took most of the food they produced. They were delighted that a new state, with men to represent the needs of the common people, was born…almost still-born, they would soon learn.

Indeed, new evils were soon coming to replace the old ones–new evils that followed like toes of boots stepping on the heels of the feet of the old ones.

A great new leader, once thought to be a liberator of the people, would soon call himself “emperor,” and would conquer many nations–though he would be defeated soon enough.

More significantly, while those farmers who now lived off the land in relative peace, without lords to have to give most of their food to, were happy in this state for a time, new masters would come. These would buy off the land and force the farmers off of it, making them move to the cities to find work in filthy, smoky buildings, castles that blew fumes into the skies.

The people would work for a pittance, barely enough to live on, and thus would begin a new trough, the worst of them all.

Analysis of ‘The Soft Machine’

I: Introduction

The Soft Machine is a 1961 novel by William S Burroughs. It originally came from manuscripts from The Word Hoard, a large body of text (roughly 1,000 typewritten pages) produced between about 1954 and 1958, and used as the basis also for Naked Lunch and the Interzone collection, as well as some of Nova Express and The Ticket That Exploded. TSM is the first part of The Nova Trilogy.

An experimental novel, TSM uses the cut-up technique, an aleatory narrative that involves taking a written or typewritten text, cutting it up into pieces, and rearranging them to create a new text. The concept started with Dadaists like Tristan Tzara in the 1920s, yet writers like Burroughs in the 1950s popularized it.

Two things from Burroughs’s novel were later applied to music: its title, which became the name of a late 1960s/1970s psychedelic/jazz-fusion band from the Canterbury scene (check out an analysis I did of their third album here); and the expression “heavy metal,” used by Burroughs originally to describe a heavy, “metallic” kind of drug addiction.

I am basing this analysis on the second edition of TSM, with which most readers are familiar. Here is a link to it, and here is a link to Burroughs reciting “Uranian Willy,” which is a different version from the text I’ll be using.

II: General Remarks

As I did with my analysis of the Naked Lunch novel, I’ll only be looking at select parts of TSM, since the cut-up technique has created a chaotic incoherence that would make an analysis of everything virtually impossible, at best turning a blog article into a book. I’ll be looking at those parts that do read as a linear narrative (or approximately so), such as ‘The Mayan Caper,” among others.

Because of the cut-up technique’s causing of the story to jump back and forth instead of being linear, it would perhaps be best to read TSM more like an extended prose poem than as a novel, appreciating each piece of imagery for what it is, instead of trying mentally to put all the pieces back in order, a frustrating process that would negate Burroughs’s purpose in cutting up the text anyway.

His reason for cutting up the text and rearranging it was not some kind of avant-garde self-indulgence for its own sake. He was trying to subvert the reader’s sense of perceiving the linearity of language as a manipulative or coercive power. As with so much of Burroughs’s writing (as I observed in my analysis of NL–link above), he was preoccupied with systems of power and control, as manifested in religion, the government, drug addiction, and sexual indulgence as an attempt to escape from such control.

Burroughs may have written about drug abuse a lot, but he by no means glorified it. He knew the pain of addiction and the need to be freed of it, so notions of drug abuse are a major theme in his writing as an aspect of power structures’ way of trying to control us, as we see in NL and TSM. For Burroughs, the human body is a “soft machine,” a weak, vulnerable thing under siege by parasites, drug addiction, and totalitarian control.

One of those forms of totalitarian control is the linear use of language, so the purpose of the cut-up technique is to liberate us from the linguistic aspect of that control. One aspect of TSM is a tendency to go back and forth in time, as if in a time machine (indeed, it’s been observed that Burroughs’s title for the novel is a variation on HG Wells‘s Time Machine), so the cut-up technique can be seen as representing that moving back and forth in time, instead of experiencing it in the normal, linear way.

The idea that the cut-up technique can be a metaphor for time travel is suggested in “The Mayan Caper,” in the third paragraph of that chapter, where the narrator speaks of taking yesterday’s and today’s newspapers and rearranging their pictures to make a montage: as he does this, he’s literally moving back in time to yesterday.

Though it’s the first novel of The Nova Trilogy, TSM is also widely regarded as a sequel to and extension of NL, since both novels are taken from The Word Hoard, as mentioned above, and so TSM continues NL‘s habit of explicitly describing drug abuse and homosexual sex, these being ways of trying to escape the miseries of totalitarian control through the government and religion, yet also paradoxically keeping us in its thrall, as slaves to our own desires.

The political aspect of that control, as depicted in NL, was in the form of political parties that all (except for the sympathetic Factualists, who represented Burroughs’s libertarian socialist individualism) in their own ways stifled the individualism that Burroughs valued. The religious aspect of that control in NL was represented by the Muslim faith (i.e., “Islam Incorporated”); in TSM, it’s represented by the Mayan religion, which leads me to a discussion of…

III: The Mayan Caper

This is not only the one genuinely linear narrative in all of the novel; it’s also central to understanding the meaning behind the cut-up technique as a means of undoing the manipulative and coercive power, as Burroughs saw it, of language, especially as it passes through linear time. One upsets the established order by literally upsetting the word order of syntax and temporal order (i.e., going back in time to the Mayan era).

I already mentioned above how the narrator ‘traveled time’ by rearranging the pictures of the day’s newspaper with those of the newspaper from the day before to make a montage–analogous to the cut-up technique’s rearranging of the order of cut-out sentences on strips of paper. He will also mention how the oppressive Mayan priests will use the Mayan calendar–a record and arrangement of the order of time–to control their slavish, toiling population, who work in the fields doing slash-and-burn agriculture.

After rearranging temporal order with the newspaper pictures, the narrator goes to a film studio and rearranges the order of time by learning “to talk and think backwards on all levels…by running film and sound track backward.” An example of such retrograde motion includes going from satiety to hunger. He will also run a film first at normal speed, then in slow motion…he applies the same method to such physical practices as achieving orgasm, which I assume means either delaying it (what fun!) or reversing it.

He next goes to Mexico City and learns all he can about the Mayan language (which he finds easy to learn) and their culture. The absolute power of the Mayan priests, about two percent of the population, depended on their control of their calendar. As I explained above, control over temporal order and the concepts of language–as expressed, for example, in their calendar–is essential to manipulating and having power over the people–this is why messing up that order is so crucial to liberating the people, as Burroughs saw it.

Slash-and-burn agriculture–what the priests use to keep the population obedient, ever-toiling slaves–is a matter of precise timing, according to the narrator. It must be done at specific times; “a few days’ miscalculation and a year’s crop is lost.” We see once again how temporal order is strictly maintained for the priests to retain power over their people.

Most of the hieroglyphs from the Mayan writings refer to dates on the calendar; the other, undeciphered symbols probably refer to the ceremonial calendar. Yet again, we see how language, mixed with temporal organization, is used to manipulate and control the Mayan people.

After learning of the Mayan language and culture, the narrator has to find a “vessel,” that is, the body of a Mayan boy in whom the narrator is to be transferred–his soul moved into it for the purposes of mixing in unnoticed among the Mayan population after traveling in time back to their era. The two are to do this procedure, an illegal one, with an American doctor who has lost his certificate due to having become addicted to heavy metal [!].

What’s ironic here is how the narrator’s mission–to liberate the Mayan people from their oppressive priests and systems of language and the temporal order of their calendars–is to be facilitated with the help of a doctor also in need of liberation (i.e., the “soft machine” of his body controlled by the hardening, heavy, metallic nature of his drug addiction). Furthermore, the doctor learns, from his examination of the Mayan boy’s naked body, that his body “is riddled with parasites,” which are another major form of control dealt with in TSM. Another paradox of liberation via the aid of the non-liberated.

The narrator “would be eaten body and soul by crab parasites” if the doctor used “the barbarous method used by…[his] colleagues”, so instead he’ll use a different technique for the transfer operation. He’ll operate with molds, keeping the narrator intact in deepfreeze.

Once the transfer operation is done, the narrator goes to find a “broker” who will help him achieve time travel to the Mayan era. The method of traveling time should be of no surprise to those familiar with Burroughs’s writing: it involves nothing other than drinking a drug, made from dried mushrooms and herbs that the broker cooks in a clay pot.

The narrator feels the motion sickness of time travel, he pays the broker his fee, and he finds himself in a jungle. When he comes to a clearing, he sees a number of workers in a field planting corn. He feels “the rushing weight of evil insect control forcing [his] thoughts and feelings into prearranged molds, squeezing [his] spirit into a soft invisible vise”, and he is handed a planting stick from one of the workers. He’s gone from time machine to soft machine, the parasitic insects taking control of his body.

He comes across as “a half-witted young Indian”, which will be useful to him, since he’ll never be suspected by the priests as a threat to their power. He can thus possibly be transferred from field work to rock carving the stellae after a long apprenticeship and the priests have total confidence he’ll show no resistance to their power. He stays, therefore, for months as a field worker and keeps a low profile.

He learns of two horrible punishments for anyone who tries to challenge, or even just thinks of challenging, the priests’ authority: “Death in the Ovens,” and “Death In Centipede“, this latter one involving being strapped to a couch and eaten alive by giant centipedes–executions carried out secretly in rooms under the temple.

In order to mess with the system of controlling the people and thus liberate them, the narrator needs access to a machine the Mayans know how to use, but not how to repair were it to be broken, or how to build a new one were it to be destroyed. Since the machine uses recordings (i.e., on magnetic tape, something not invented until the 1920s), it’s clearly an anachronism that Burroughs, in his surreal imagination, has invented out of poetic licence–this anachronism is also reflective of TSM‘s theme of rearranging the temporal order of things.

To gain access to the machine, the narrator agrees, in all disgust and reluctance, to do a sexual favour for one of the priests–the latter transforming himself into a green crab from the waist up during the sex act. The narrator is able to endure all of this by reassuring himself that he’ll enjoy killing the man when the time comes. So after the narrator’s sexual ordeal, the priest transfers him to janitor work in the temple, where he witnesses executions: bodies torn into insect fragments by the ovens, and centipedes born in the ovens from those fragments. It’s time for him to act.

The narrator uses the drug he got from the doctor to take over the priest’s body, he gets into the room where the codices are kept, and he photographs the books. He dismantles the machine by mixing the order of recordings and images, a change that will be picked up by the machine and fed into it. Recorded agricultural operations–the slash and burn–are shuffled so they’ll occur at the wrong times, losing a year’s crop, and causing famine.

He sends out a new command, essentially: “Smash the control machine–Burn the books–Kill the priests–Kill! Kill! Kill!” And with this, to make a long story short, comes the toppling of the Mayan “regime,” to use the word in, of all sources with an obvious liberal agenda, the Wikipedia article. This leads to my next point.

Now, a bringing of an end to the Mayan tyranny is all fine and good…if such is an accurate representation of what their priestly authority was really like. Yet with an anachronism like their machine and its ‘recordings’ as central to the priests’ power, I’d say such accuracy is rather unlikely, to put it mildly.

Matters get more sinister when we consider how this whole “Mayan caper” (interesting choice of words in itself) has been conceived by, of all people, Americans, and for the purpose of toppling an aboriginal “regime” in what’s today Latin America. Yes, the tankie in me is coming out for commentary again.

Of course, there’s nothing inherently socialist about the Mayan “regime.” Remember also, though, that in the opinion of an anarchist–as Burroughs can reasonably be described to have been–neither were the USSR or the Soviet Bloc, nor have China, Cuba, Vietnam, North Korea, or Laos ever been ‘genuinely socialist.’ Any state is oppressive, whether right-wing, left-wing, or centrist, in the eyes of your average anarchist or ‘left-wing’ communist, especially in the eyes of individualist libertarian socialists like Burroughs…so what difference did it make to him whether or not the Mayan priests were socialists?

The point is that it has been a standard practice of US and Western imperialism to do regime change on any country out there that goes against imperialist interests. The first step of such regime change is to justify it by claimning that those “regimes” are oppressive: exactly what we are meant to understand about the Mayan priests–it’s all propaganda, meant to manufacture consent for said regime change.

The ruling class has always found anarchists useful in agreeing that state socialism isn’t ‘real socialism,’ and is therefore tyrannical. The capitalists can say of the anarchists, “See, even fellow leftists agree that the socialist states are no better than capitalist ones, so we should oppose them!” In helping imprialism crush, for example, the Soviet resistance, through their own propaganda, anarchists give the working class “the unkindest cut.”

IV: Uranian Willy

“Heavy metal,” as Burroughs used the expression, had nothing to do with music, of course. I recall seeing him on TV (back when I was still living in Canada) talking about his use of “heavy metal”; I wish I could find the video of him talking about this on YouTube so I can share it here, but my foggy memory of it will have to serve. He was talking about a “metallic” drug experience.

So Uranian Willy, “the heavy metal kid,” personifies drug addiction at its worst: where it has gone from the organic (vegetable) to the mineral (metallic). Willy thus represents the final stage of addiction, a “heavy metal” addiction to junk, sex, and power.

He may be among the “Nova Mob,” a group of parasitic entities attempting to destroy the Earth by manipulating human thought and flesh through “word and image” machines (rather like that of the Mayans, just discussed above), but also being closely associated with Will Lee (who in turn represents Burroughs), Uranian Willy also wishes to break free of his drug addiction and thus free everyone else from addiction’s thought control. Hence, he is also known as “Willy the Rat,” or “Willy the Fink,” for having turned his back on and snitched on the Nova Mob. “He wised up the marks”–that is, he got them to understand how they’re being manipulated. Recall Burroughs’s dictum from Naked Lunch: “Hustlers of the world, there is one mark you cannot beat: the mark inside.” You can fool others, but you cannot fool yourself.

Willy’s efforts to liberate others (“the marks”) from heavy metal drug addiction is compared, on one level, to a pilot in a fighter plane attacking “the Reality Studio and retak[ing] the universe”–“target[ing] Orgasm Ray Installations.” On another level, Willy’s resistance can be compared–in terms of its somewhat similar language–to the narrator of “The Mayan Caper” and his changed commands in the Mayan machine to “Burn the books–kill the priests–Kill! Kill! Kill!”

“This is war to extermination,” Willy understands of his wish to end his dependency on heavy metal. He must “wise up the marks everywhere,” and get them to understand the dangers of drug addiction and how the powers-that-be use it to control the minds of the masses. To wise them up, he must “show them the rigged wheel,” how the marks are being played by those in power. He must save the “Souls rotten from the Orgasm Drug” of heavy metal.

So in this context, we can see how passages like “Photo falling–Word falling–..Take Studio–Take Board Books…Towers, open fire” are similar to what happens when the narrator in “The Mayan Caper” messes with the Mayan machine and its words and images to overthrow the Mayan regime.

Now, members of the Nova Mob are alarmed at Willy’s having suddenly gone rogue and against them, so they try to get him to stop his attack: “Pilot K9, you are cut off–Back–Back–Back before the whole fucking shithouse goes up–Return to base immediately.”

It seems, however, that the Nova Mob have failed in their attempt to stop Uranian Willy, for “It was impossible to estimate the damage–Board Rooms destroyed–Enemy personnel decimated–…Shift linguals–Cut word lines…Photo failing–Word failing…”

Note how “Shift linguals–Cut word lines…” and “Word failing…” sounds a lot like the cut-up technique’s disruption of the natural flow of language as a way of liberating humanity from systems of control. The Nova Mob is being overthrown just as the Mayan priests were.

V: Gongs of Violence

The sexes are at war, dividing the planet right down the middle. It’s a perfect way for the ruling class, with their systems of power and control, to keep us all from resisting and fighting them: make us all fight each other instead, through idpol. [This battle of the sexes, incidentally, should not be confused with the legitimate and necessary struggle for the equality of the sexes, to allow equal opportunity for women, to end their domestic servitude, and to end their sexual degradation. Such an attainment of equality necessitates solidarity between men and women through the adoption of socialism, not the divisiveness of edgy liberal identity politics.]

The armies on both sides seem to have adopted homosexuality, for one army has “Lesbian colonels in tight green uniforms.” Those on either side are deemed “the Sex Enemy.”

Since there is no true love between the sexes in this world, there are no heterosexual marriages or families, and there’s no natural parenthood. Children, therefore, are just “property,” usually not owned by their biological parents.

Each of these “properties” has a “life script,” which sounds again like the use of a predetermined language for the purposes of control by the ruling class. Those with “a lousy grade B life script” may complain…to their mothers, whether adoptive or biological?…”Fuck my life script will you you cheap downgrade bitch!”

The idea that “time-nappers jerk the time position of a property” sounds like an example of how normal linear time is also used as an instrument of power and control by the ruling class, and so “time-nappers,” who “jerk the time position,” are engaging in acts of resistance against the powers-that-be. “The property can also be jerked forward in time and sold at any age,” which sounds as though those in power also manipulate temporal order to maintain power, through the selling of children.

With vivid descriptions of a cityscape we also have vivid descriptions of fighting and violence there, presumably manifestations or results of the battle of the sexes. “Rioters of all nations storm the city in a landslide of flame-throwers and Molotov cocktails.”

Amidst all of this fighting and surrealist description is the ongoing battle for the souls of the people: on one side, those trying to liberate us from the heavy metal addiction: “We are converting to vegetable state–Emergency measure to counter the heavy metal peril”; and on the other side, there are those trying to keep us all addicted to heavy metal: “we are converting all out to heavy metal. Cabonic plague of the Vegetable People threatens our Heavy Metal State…Do not believe the calumny that our metal fallout will turn the planet into a slag heap.”

“Gongs of violence” on the one hand sounds like explosions ringing out like the banging of gongs, and on the other hand like a pun on ‘gangs of violence,’ a male gang vs a female one in the sex war.

The world of this sex war seems to be a future dystopia, which fits in well with the sense of time travel going on throughout TSM. The destruction of cities is implied in the spelling of a number of them without the first letter of each: Ewyork, Onolulu, Aris, Ome, Oston.”

VI: Cross the Wounded Galaxies

In this final chapter, we seem to have traveled time yet again: this time, to the very beginning of human consciousness. The “muttering sickness” has come to “the ape forms,” or the first primitive man, who are able to speak. Since Burroughs regarded language, and the normal, ordered use of it, to be a form of power and control over humanity, he saw it as a “sickness.”

The sickness was brought to the narrator of this chapter “from white time caves frozen in [his] throat.” The “sick apes spitting blood laugh, sound bubbling in throats torn with the talk sickness.” The primates are learning to speak, which is a kind of forbidden fruit of the Tree of Knowledge, so to speak, that is going to lead them all to their collective ruin.

And with language, they now have names. They’ve come out of the mud and are about to enter civilization, and all the irreparable harm it causes, as Burroughs saw it. “The sickness leaped into our body…cold screaming sickness from white time…spitting ape wounds…the talking sickness had names…we had names for each other.”

The “talking sickness” sounds like a rejection of the psychoanalytic “talking cure.” Just as Burroughs didn’t trust language, he didn’t trust the Freudians as people who used therapy as a tool of control. On the other hand, the “ape forms” problematically having names for each other sounds representative of ego formation, which a later Freudian–Jacques Lacan–saw as illusory.

“White time” and “the white worm-thing inside” (this latter being a parasite as yet another instrument of control) seem to represent white supremacy. The “fear-softness in other men” would be the soft machine, or the vulnerable human body in its susceptibility to all the forms of control: time, language, parasites, and heavy metal drug addiction.

“The thing inside [him, that is, “the white worm-sickness in all our bodies”] would always find animals to feed [his] mouth meat.” The parasites inside us that control us always make us kill for food, which includes eating other humans.

There seems to be a jump ahead in time later on in the chapter, for we read of “sewers of the city, crab parasites in [their] genitals.” What was parasitic in prehistory is still parasitic now.

As we have moved from prehistory to the modern world, in Burroughs’s time machine of the rearranged words of his cut-up technique, we encounter a proliferation of the evils begun in the era of the “ape forms”: more parasites and tapeworms, people with names (“Mr. Bradley Mr. Martin”), the authoritarianism of religion (“I am Allah. I made you.”), and shattered windows (“Glass blizzards”), the result of vandalism, or war? There are even Orwellian “Think Police”.

Time travel seems to go into the future again, with presumed astronauts who “cross the wounded galaxies”: Earth seems not to be the only planet infected with parasitical forms of power and control. After all, the “heavy metal boys” are from Uranus, hence “Uranian Willy, the heavy metal kid.”

VII: Conclusion

What TSM is trying to tell us is that the most significant and dangerous forms of manipulation and control that we have to be wary of are not so much those of the government, religion, or even the capitalist class. They are those that we have all internalized: what the parasites and the heavy metal addictions are metaphors for–whatever we allow inside ourselves to have power over and harden the soft machine of the human body.

The Tanah: Crests–Chapter One

[The following is the forty-fourth of many posts–here is the first, here is the second, here is the third, here is the fourth, here is the fifth, here is the sixth, here is the seventh, here is the eighth, here is the ninth, here is the tenth, here is the eleventh, here is the twelfth, here is the thirteenth, here is the fourteenth, here is the fifteenth, here is the sixteenth, here is the seventeenth, here is the eighteenth, here is the nineteenth, here is the twentieth, here is the twenty-first, here is the twenty-second, here is the twenty-third, here is the twenty-fourth, here is the twenty-fifth, here is the twenty-sixth, here is the twenty-seventh, here is the twenty-eighth, here is the twenty-ninth, here is the thirtieth, here is the thirty-first, here is the thirty-second, here is the thirty-third, here is the thirty-fourth, here is the thirty-fifth, here is the thirty-sixth, here is the thirty-seventh, here is the thirty-eighth, here is the thirty-ninth, here is the fortieth, here is the forty-first, here is the forty-second, and here is the forty-third–about a fictitious discovery of ancient manuscripts of a religious text of narratives and magic spells. Its purpose for my readers and me is to provide a cosmology and mythography on which I am basing much, if not most, of my fiction–short stories and novels. If anyone is interested in reading this fiction, he or she can use these blog posts as references to explain the nature of the magic and universe in my fiction.]

Translator’s Introduction

The following is the first of a trilogy of writings of visions of periods of good fortune, this first one for the Luminosian tribe specifically, and the other two for the future of humanity in general, with whom the tribe would be intermarried.

The tribe’s plan for liberation–to make bracelets marked with images of the four Crims personified, and to wear them faithfully–worked gloriously for them, not only freeing them from slavery to the Zoyans, but also ushering in a long period of peace and prosperity for the tribe. The tribe is warned never to lose faith in the Crims as they continue wearing the bracelets, though, lest their fortunes should turn ill.

Such a loss of faith would come one day, though, many generations down the line, and the tribe, by now intermarried with other ethnic groups they’re living with, would then begin a descent into another trough, the “feudal” one described in “Troughs, Chapter Two.”

Chapter One

Glory be to the mighty Crims, who in response to our faithful wearing of their bracelets, will not lose faith in us, and who will soon liberate us from the oppressive Zoyans!

The drugs we extracted from the plants and herbs of Drofurb’s earthly body have given us visions of a certain future of liberation from slavery to the Zoyans. We will be free; we will prosper!

In our visions, we saw a pestilence overwhelm our Zoyan oppressors, wiping them out quickly, one by one, until none of them are left…yet the pestilence will not affect even one of us Luminosians! We will all walk out of Zoyan land unhindered and unscathed, free to find a new land to settle in.

When we find that new land, as our visions have shown, we will have the wisdom not to take the land from those who live there, as we had the Zagans, but instead to live with them peacefully and in mutual respect. We will engage in commerce with them, and we will thrive with them, growing from our poverty as wandering former slaves into a wealthy, happy people!

For many generations since that time, we will continue to live well, because we will keep faith in the Crims as we pass the bracelets from the old to the young. We will remember those four of the air–Weleb, the earth–Drofurb, the fire–Nevil, and the water–Priff, who all saved us from servitude, and we will teach the younger generations to have the same respect.

Thus will the land we live in grow in fertility and bounty, giving us plentiful food, good weather for growing crops, and a peaceful coexistence with the other peoples we mix with. We will even marry with them, adopt many of their cultural values and beliefs, and become much more than just Luminosians.

There should be nothing wrong in any of these changes, as long as we continue to keep faith with the Crims as the bracelets are passed down; but over time, as the newer and newer generations are diluted of our Luminosian values and beliefs, they will forget, if not be utterly ignorant of, the importance of believing in the Crims as they wear the bracelets.

O, the new generations will love the beauty of the bracelets! They will not, however, understand, much less appreciate, their meaning. This ignorance will be the people’s downfall, for the good luck given from the bracelets comes only from faith in the Crims. Wearing the bracelets without that faith leads only to ill fortune.

The faithless wearers of the bracelets will see that ill fortune in the beginning of a new trough.